When an older man at my church moved into an upscale retirement community, he was invited to attend a weekly Bible study with his neighbors, some of whom turned out to be retired Baptist preachers.

 

Knowing these ministers did not follow dispensational truth, he asked them to explain why Paul wrote in Romans 2:16, ÒIn the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.Ó

 

ÒThe question is, ÔIf Jesus is going to judge us according to PaulÕs gospel, what is PaulÕs gospel?Õ Ó explains Jordan, who relayed this anecdote in a Sunday morning sermon. ÒYou can take that verse and run preachers whoÕve been preaching 40 years right up a stump in about two minutes, looking for a place to get off. With that verse you kind of get the idea that GodÕs going to hold you accountable.Ó

 

*****

 

HereÕs a great synopsis from Jordan on the difference between following PaulÕs gospel and GodÕs program to Israel:

 

ÒGod only gave one religion and He gave it to the nation Israel through the hands of Moses. We call it the law. When you read about the law in the Bible, youÕre reading about a God-given religion.

 

ÒGod didnÕt give the Baptists, Methodists, Lutherans, Catholics; He didnÕt give those religions. Men made those things up. But He did give a religion, and religion has to do with a performance-based acceptance program before God.

 

ÒHe said, ÔIf you do this then youÕll be my people. If you donÕt, IÕm gonna curse you.Õ And the blessings came when they performed, and the curse came when they didnÕt and his relationship with them was based on their performance and thatÕs what religion is all about. ItÕs gaining acceptance with God based on your performance.

 

ÒThatÕs why legalism is something God just wonÕt put up with in your life because the way God accepts people is in His Son Jesus Christ, not in your performing.

 

ÒAnd with that law God gave Israel—that performance-based acceptance program—had they leaned the lesson and listened to the schoolmaster, it would have brought them to Christ because they would have had to come and say, ÔLord, we canÕt do it.Õ

 

ÒAnd when they couldnÕt do it, they had a system to take care of their failures—those sacrifices. But that veil covered their eyes and you know what they did? Paul says in Romans 10:3 says, ÔFor they being ignorant of GodÕs righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.Õ

 

ÒPaul says, ÔMy heartÕs desire is that these people—my kinsmen according to the flesh—

get saved, but I bear record they have a zeal for God that is not according to knowledge.Õ

 

ÒYou see, they got all kinds of religion. They got church memberships. TheyÕre a part of the right nation, the right religion; they got all the ordinances and the statutes and the ceremonies. They got it all.

 

ÒIsrael had their religion, though, not because they had faith in GodÕs Word to them. God tells them in Isaiah 58, ÔYou have all your satisfaction in approaching me. All these ceremonies. You love your religious activities because it makes you feel good. Your heartÕs far from me but, boy, youÕre caught up in religion!Õ

 

ÒAs Paul puts it, they went about to establish their own righteousness. Paul says their minds were blinded by their own works. When he says, ÔSatan hath blinded the minds of them that believe not,Õ he does that with religion. He does it with their seeking to establish their own righteousness because theyÕre ignorant of the righteousness of God.

 

ÒSatan wants to keep their minds blinded with religion—with trying to please God with their activities—lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ should shine into them, because when the light of the gospel of Christ shines in, hey, the darkness flees.Ó

 

*****

 

In Galatians 1, Paul talks about the delusion of perverting his gospel and having it drawing a Believer away from Paul. In verses 8 and 9, he addresses the danger posed by leaving his ministry and his apostleship, then goes on to document his authority through chapter two.

 

There are at least 14 different things Paul points to that demonstrate his independent, distinctive, apostolic ministry.

 

ÒHe was not part of the 12 apostles and their program and thatÕs a critically important thing to recognize,Ó says Jordan. ÒIf there are two whole chapters in your Bible about that one subject—that bring evidences to bear about that subject—somebody needs somewhere to ask the question, ÔWhy in the world is Paul in the bible?!Õ

 

ÒYou know the one question that Christendom just never seems to come around to ask is why Paul? TheyÕll go through Matthew, Mark, Luke and John and even the Book of Acts, but when it comes to Romans, all of a sudden it just kind of goes away.

 

ÒI had a man tell me one time, ÔYou know I just never did like that Paul.Õ ThatÕs because his writings are just so different in the Bible. Others will say, ÔWell, I read the Bible but when I come to Paul I see, hey, thatÕs what makes sense to me.Õ

 

ÒSo why is he there? ThereÕs the old legend that he was really one of the 12 apostles. And that wonÕt work. He says heÕs not. He starts in Gal. 1:1, ÔBut I certify you, brethren,Õ meaning, ÔHereÕs my ordination certificate. IÕm giving you a notarized official document that the gospel preached of me is not after man. It didnÕt have origin in human viewpoint.Õ

 

ÒIÕve pointed out to you many times, when you appreciate the gospel of the grace of God you know no human ever dreamed that thing up. Anybody who would ask you . . . if God were to come to you and say, ÔWhat should I give you to do?Õ Did you ever do that with your kids? Parents will say, ÔOkay, you did wrong. Now what do you think your punishment ought to be?Õ Well, thatÕs like BrÕer Rabbit: ÔDonÕt throw me into that sticker bush, please!Õ

 

ÒIf God came and said, ÔWhat do you think your punishment should be?Õ you know youÕd have just said, ÔWell, give me something to do and IÕll do it.Õ You know youÕd have never come up with the idea, ÔLord, I canÕt do anything. YouÕll have to go die for me.Õ

 

ÒBut that was the original thinking God had about salvation! So itÕs not after manÕs view. When Paul testifies, ÔFor I neither received it of man,Õ that means he didnÕt get it by any human instrumentality or human authorization. That means the people there before him didnÕt teach it to him. He verifies, ÔNeither was I taught it.Õ

 

ÒWell, if he wasnÕt taught it, then it wasnÕt there prior to him Ôbut by the revelation of Jesus Christ.Õ He was taught it by the Lord Jesus Christ! And notice itÕs not a revelation from the Lord Jesus Christ. ItÕs the revelation of  Jesus Christ. Those prepositions are important. It isnÕt just that God revealed something to him; itÕs that the Lord Jesus Christ himself appeared to Paul and communicated the information to him.

 

ÒIn Acts 26, when Jesus Christ said, ÔI will appear to thee,Õ HeÕs standing right there appearing to Paul. So the future appearances—the future revelations of the Lord Jesus Christ—are the fact that HeÕs going to appear to Paul again and again. We know from II Cor. 12:1, Paul saw the Lord repeatedly. This is something the whole religious system is out there trying to get you to forget.Ó