Prophecy in the Bible isnÕt just telling people whatÕs
going to happen in the future; itÕs God revealing in His Word, ÔThis is what IÕm
going to do,Õ and then making it happen.
Fulfillment of prophecy is the great apologetic God
looks for. His famous challenge to all the worldÕs gods in Isaiah 41 is simply,
ÒProduce your cause, saith the LORD; bring forth your strong reasons, saith the
King of Jacob.
[22] Let them bring them forth, and shew us what shall happen: let them
shew the former things, what they be, that we may consider them, and know the
latter end of them; or declare us things for to come.
[23] Shew the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that
ye are gods: yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it
together.Ó
God confirms through Isaiah in chapter 42, ÒI am the
LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my
praise to graven images.
[9] Behold, the former things are come to pass, and new things do I
declare: before they spring forth I tell you of them.Ó
As Jordan explains, ÒGod says, ÔYou got this religion
and that religion—the way you do it is let (your gods) tell you what the
futureÕs gonna be and let them bring it to pass.Õ Ó
*****
The demonstrative proof that the Word of God is GodÕs
word is that it has embedded in it an integrated message system that
demonstrates itself to have been supernaturally produced and engineered.
ÒThereÕs no way GodÕs word could simply be manÕs word,Ó
says Jordan. ÒIt has an integrated message system in it that, when you begin to
study it from the beginning all the way to the end, you see this supernatural system
of communication.
ÒThe person who wrote Genesis knew information that was
impossible to know until the Apostle Paul comes on the scene in 35 A.D., and
you say, ÔWell, wait a minute, how did this writer back here in Genesis 4,000
years before that know about it and know how to encode it into the text of Genesis
so that you couldnÕt know it was there until it happened over here?!Õ
ÒAnd once you see it happen over here, then you can
look back and say, ÔHey, there it is back there!Õ What that demonstrates is
that whoever wrote the Bible was not bound by time.
ÒDan BrownÕs Da
Vinci Code was a book about deciphering encrypted codes. If you were looking
for the code in the Da Vinci Code to
tell you the book is a hoax, it was right there in the name of the biggest liar
in the book—the protagonist Sir Lee Teabing.Ó
In a nutshell, Brown used the pseudo-documentary
tome Holy Blood, Holy Grail, written by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh,
and Henry Lincoln, as the basis for his novel and the character name Lee
Teabing is a scrambled version of the names of Baigent and Leigh.
*****
Typology is the term generally used for the macrocodes intricately
woven throughout Scripture. The Bible contains 66 books written by more than 40
authors over a period of at least 3,000 years and yet itÕs like one person
wrote all of it.
Starting with the earliest accounts in Genesis, Jordan points
to some remarkable correlations with the New TestamentÕs unveiling of Christ as
Messiah and Savior.
ÒAdam was given the original Ôcoat of many colorsÕ
because the clothing he had matched the clothing the Lord Jesus Christ wore
when He came and walked with Adam in Ôthe cool of the dayÕ every morning,Ó says
Jordan. ÒSo when the angels and creation would look at Adam and look at Christ,
they would know theyÕre clothed the same way. Adam was the image of God. He was
GodÕs representative in the earth. He had a uniform and everybody knew He was GodÕs
man, but when he and Eve sinned, the uniform went away, so He makes His own
covering.
ÔThe fig leaves they had for britches (dried up) so God
went and got them the skin of an animal. How did He get that? ThereÕs not but one way. He had to shed some innocent blood to take the
animal skin and clothe Adam and Eve.
ÒWho would have thunk thatÕs what it was going to take
to have you clothed in the righteousness of God—the shedding of innocent
blood?! Nobody! In fact, thatÕs information you donÕt
know until thousands of years later after the events in the Garden of Eden and
the writing of the Book of Genesis.
ÒHow is it that the writer of Genesis and the actor in
Genesis knew something—knew to do the narrative in a certain way that
would reflect something that couldnÕt be known for at least 4,000 years?!
ÒYou see the impossibility of that?!
Whoever wrote Genesis, and whoever set up the scenario back here of dealing
with this, was not somebody who was bound by time. We say they were
extraterrestrial, or outside of time. When I say E.T., IÕm not talking about
the little creature with the funny-looking little finger; IÕm talking about the
real one!Ó
*****
From Genesis 7:11, we know that it was Òin the six
hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the
month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the
windows of heaven were opened.Ó
Marking the end of the Flood, Genesis 8:4 reads, ÒAnd
the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon
the mountains of Ararat.Ó
Jordan explains, ÒFor five months, the ark (which is a
picture of Christ) is bobbing around and it rested on the 17th day
of that fifth month. Five in the bible is the number of death, but 17—itÕs
the 17th day when they begin to emerge from the ark out of death.
ÒWe know that the Lord Jesus Christ, when He died on
the Cross, He died on the Passover. The 14th day
of the month. That evening HeÕs in the ground. HeÕs resurrected on the
17th day.
ÔI read that about NoahÕs ark and I think, ÔI wonder if
the (writer) realized the date of the resurrection of Christ when he wrote
that?Õ Well, no (Moses) didnÕt, but then yes, (God) did! You see, somebody orchestrated the thing so that the water went
down and the ark rested on the dry ground on the 17th day.
ÒItÕs just going to happen to be (Bible chronologist
James UssherÕs got the Flood dated at 2,350 B.C) that 2,380 years later, Christ
is going to come out of the grave on the same day! And you say, ÔThatÕs a
coincidence,Õ but the mathematical probability of that happening is beyond
calculation.Ó
(EditorÕs Note: To be continued . . . )