If you want a single name
for whoÕs to blame in the dumbing down of America, John Dewey gets my vote.
Liberal Humanist Dewey
(1859-1952), the man behind the Dewey Decimal System, is recognized as the
ÒFather of the Progressive Education Movement,Ó that first gained dominance in
AmericaÕs public school systems and universities in the 1950s and took over
everything by the early Õ70s.
ÒThe fundamental dogma of
this movement is probably best defined as a mixture of collectivist (i. e.,
socialistic, even Marxist) political theory and Freudian/Jungian psychology,Ó
writes Sam Weaver for the website www.renewamerica.us.
ÒThe goal of the progressive education movement was (and remains today) to
subvert American founding ideas and principles and to replace them with secular
and collectivist directives and Ôvalues.Õ It was (and is) a permissive,
ÔUnitarian UniversalistÕ approach to education.Ó
Dewey, contributor to the
original Humanist Manifesto who wholeheartedly embraced relativism and the New
AgersÕ global government, was once quoted saying, ÒFaith in the prayer-hearing
God is an unproved and outmoded faith. There is no God and there is no soul. Hence, there are no needs for the
props of traditional religion. With dogma and creed excluded, then immutable
truth is dead and buried. There is no room for fixed, natural law or moral absolutes."
As Weaver
further reports, Ò(Dewey) was highly influential in the establishment of the
modern National Education Association (NEA), and he all but single-handedly
set the ultra-liberal standard to which the NEA adheres to this day.
Ò[Incidentally,
with the blessing of the U. S. Department of Education, established in 1979
during the Carter Administration, the NEA has become one of the most —
if not the most — powerful forces for shaping the hearts and minds of
America's youth.]
Dewey refined and established curricula at New York's Columbia University
Teacher's College for the express purpose of bringing about "social
progress and reform."
ÓMany today idolize John Dewey as a great thinker and an icon of public
education. Increasingly, however, clear-thinking Ôregular folksÕ —
especially those trapped in inner-city public schools or those who have
children who must attend these schools — are beginning to see the
dreadfully destructive force of his Ôprogressive,Õ permissive, Ôtouchy-feelyÕ
approach to indoctrination . ..er, pardon me, Ôeducation.Õ "
*****
HereÕs what
my pastor, Richard Jordan, had to say about DeweyÕs disastrous influence on America
in a sermon the other week:
ÒThe
problem in the government school system, folks, is not that they donÕt have
enough money. The problem is theyÕre using a flawed system of education that started
with John Dewey in the first half of the last century.
ÒDeweyÕs
idea was to use the school as a socialization vehicle and he knew he couldnÕt just
come into a school and say, ÔNow we donÕt need to teach grammar, we need to
teach this Gestalt-type kind of a thing,Õ so what he did was go after the
college professors, determining, ÔIÕm going to teach the teachers who teach the
teachers.Õ
ÒHe
realized he could start at the top and control that. ThatÕs why it is today
that the university campuses of America are the last bastion of Marxism on the
face of the planet outside of Communist China, and it isnÕt even that strong
there.
ÒIÕve been
to former Communist countries. IÕve sat with former Communist officials in Eastern
Europe and talked to them about their Communism and most of them had no real
commitment to it. IÕm talking about people who can speak five to seven
languages and were diplomats and representatives of the country. You talked to
them and they said, ÔWell, we were idealistic. We wanted to serve people and
that was the tool that was placed in our hand, but it was flawed.Õ
ÒIt doesnÕt
work and theyÕve abandoned it for something else—not necessarily
something better, or more workable, like youÕd hope for, but they abandoned it
nonetheless.
ÒYou say,
ÔWell why is it in the American university campuses?Õ Because there was this
concerted effort to do that and it wasnÕt challenged. The revisionist histories
and so forth—the multiculturalism that says every culture is equal to
another and thereÕs no absolute and thereÕs no one thatÕs exactly
right—all go back to Dewey. He had this conviction and he promulgated it among
the elitists and itÕs come down to your childrenÕs classrooms
ÒItÕs not
the teachers; itÕs the methodology theyÕre following to get you there. ItÕs the
basic rudiments of the thing thatÕs the problem. By the way, thatÕs where the Christian
school movement came from in the late Õ60s, early Õ70s. A host of Christian
people began to realize what the problem was and they said, ÔWe donÕt want
that!Õ
ÒAnd now
all across America you have private Christian schools, and since the late Õ70s
and early Õ80s, the home-school movement took off and thatÕs a whole other
horse of a different race, and a different issue, but itÕs all been an
attempt to try to teach Johnny to read and Mary to count and it has nothing to
do with money spent. You
know that in Christian schools they donÕt spend nearly the money the government
schools do. But you get a much different kind of result in that thing.Ó