Obviously
the underlying reason people are anxious for scientists to prove evolution is so they can
discard any notion of an Almighty God who will ultimately hold them
accountable.
As
renowned humanist Aldous Huxley (1894-1963) writes in his classic, Confessions
of a Professed Atheist, ÒI had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning,
consequently assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find
satisfying reasons for this assumption.
ÒThe
philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with
a problem in pure metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid
reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do.
ÒFor
myself, as no doubt for many of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaningless
was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was
simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and
liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality
because it interfered with our sexual freedom.Ó
*****
Under
AmericaÕs prevailing system of political correctness today, it is considered
near-disgraceful not to see the homosexual lifestyle in an empathetic light.
And a gay ÒmarriageÓ is to be seen as having the same moral, institutional validity
as any committed, monogamous heterosexual union. To view it as sinful is to be Òun-Christ-like.Ó
A
recent Q&A in the Sunday New York Times Magazine featured Mike Jones, the
male gay prostitute in Colorado who ÒoutedÓ the Rev. Ted Haggard, former head
of the National Association of Evangelicals.
In
response to the statement, ÒMillions of people appreciate that you spoke up,
but still, as a prostitute, youÕre hardly a shining exemplar of gay
accomplishment,Ó Jones justifies himself with, ÒI prefer the term Ômale
escort.Õ If I was strictly a prostitute, people would probably think I was
working the street. And IÕm not. These men were coming to me with really big
emotional issues, and I was comforting them.Ó
*****
I
remember when Billy Graham made his big ÒfinalÓ crusade in New York City a year
ago, all the endless local TV commercials for the three-day extravaganza had
him shouting from the screen, ÒGod loves you!Ó
It
made me think of how TVÕs the Rev. Robert Schuller, in the Õ80s, made this his
signature sappy sentiment for awhile: ÒGod loves you and so do I.Ó
I
remember as a high-schooler how IÕd watch him say that (with his affected voice
and gimmick smile at the pulpit of his grandiose Crystal Cathedral near Los
Angeles), and think, ÒWell, what if somebody like Charlie MansonÕs watching the
Hour of Power right
now?! Surely youÕre not really being sincere!Ó
*****
The
short little Bible verse that throws all this out the window is Psalm 5:5: ÒThe
foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity.Ó
Jordan
explains, ÒNow when that verse says ÔGod hatest all the workers of iniquity,Õ the
response should be, ÔDid you get that?!Õ Most people say, ÔWell, yeah, but, uh,
uh, uh . . .Õ ThatÕs not the response!
ÒThe
response is, ÔGod hates all workers of iniquity.Õ That verse doesnÕt say simply
that, ÔGod hates the sin but loves the sinner.Õ Do you see that? That
verse says God hates all workers of iniquity.
Another
slam-dunk little verse is Psalm 11:5: ÒThe LORD trieth the righteous: but the
wicked and him that loveth violence his soul hateth.Ó
ItÕs
followed by the assurance, ÒUpon the wicked he shall rain snares, fire and
brimstone, and an horrible tempest: this shall be the portion of their cup. For
the righteous LORD loveth righteousness; his countenance doth behold the
upright.Ó
Jordan
explains, ÒYou see, the holiness of God—the integrity of God—will
not tolerate sin and it hates it. Now, thatÕs something you need to remember
because sometimes we think that God, because of His grace and because of Calvary,
will tolerate sin. He doesnÕt.
ÒThe
Cross is the greatest demonstration of GodÕs attitude toward sin the universe
will ever see. GodÕs attitude is it took the sacrifice of His Son to put it
away. It took the sacrifice of the most valuable entity the universe could ever
possess to put away sin.
ÒIt
is a big deal, and the Cross answers it, and God commends His love toward us
that Ôwhile we were yet sinners Christ died for us.Õ While we were yet somebody
God hated, Christ made it possible for Him to love you.
ÒI
was reading that verse in Revelation 13 just yesterday about how HeÕs Ôthe lamb
slain from before the foundation of the world.Õ That means God had this stuff
planned out before He created anybody. Mercy! You talk about grace upon grace;
and righteousness and meekness—thatÕs it!
ÒPsalm
45 says God Ôlovest righteousness, and hatest wickedness. If you loved
righteousness, youÕd have to hate wickedness. Now, you know, folks, as
Believers, if you love righteousness, thereÕs no way you can love wickedness.
ItÕs okay to be intolerant about that.
ÒThis
world we live in, the stupid philosophy of Genesis 3 prevails today. People
think like itÕs something new, sophisticated and chic, and all that stuff, but
itÕs as old as the Garden of Eden.
ÒPeople
get the idea that you can tolerate evil; that everythingÕs relative and itÕs
okay just to put up with it and thatÕs not at all what the Cross teaches you. The Cross teaches you God
put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.
ÒJesus
Christ had the same thinking process; the same value system God the Father had.
He thought just like the Father. GodÕs appointed Him to be His standard-bearer.Ó
*****
As
China missionary R. Dawson Barlow writes in his 2004 book, The Origin of the
Races, ÒThe
conflict between the Bible and the various evolutionary views is not a battle between ÔreligionÕ
and Ôscience.Õ It is a war between two philosophies!
ÒIt
is a battle originating from people filled with antagonism and animosity toward
ÔGodÕ (in general) and Jesus Christ (in particular), and most of all, the
fierce denial that anyone would have to give an account of themselves to such a
God.
ÒIt
constantly rears its bloodthirsty, antagonistic head in battle array against
the claims of Jesus Christ, and most especially against our LordÕs claim of
exclusivity (Ô. . . I am THE way . . . no man cometh unto the Father but by
me.Õ)
ÒThat
is probably the most unpopular utterance that can be uttered today, even in
some circles of the world of Christian publishing. So let it be! . . . The message of our
Lord is offensive to those enamored with their own righteousness.Ó