People
are often very surprised to learn IÕm not a fan of fiction. They say, ÒBut youÕre
a writer!Ó
What
really shocks them is when I tell them that the only fiction I ever really
cared for was in Harlequin Romance paperbacks, something IÕd indulge in on a
near-daily basis during my teen years.
Now,
mind you—as I always emphasize whenever I make known this significant
piece of trivia from my past—I didnÕt care for the Harlequins that were
published after the early Õ70s and would visit the public library, or stop at
yard/garage sales, to find ones from the Õ50s and Õ60s written by British
authors.
I
found these Harlequins had much more interesting and romantic circumstances,
events, dialogue, character development, suspense, etc. The fun part was youÕd
get all the way to the last page sometimes before the couple would even embrace
or kiss. Some of them never did get to any physical contact! This all added to
the romance, of course.
*****
Yesterday,
I read in the San Diego Union-Tribune an op-ed review piece about a new book out, The
Age of American Unreason, in which the author is quoted lamenting, ÒIn 2002 the
National Endowment for the Arts released a survey indicating that fewer than
half of adult Americans had read any work of fiction or poetry in the preceding
year—not even detective novels, bodice-ripper romances, or the ÔraptureÕ
novels based on the Book of Revelation.Ó
Jacoby
said this as definitive proof for her argument on just how Òdumb and dumberÓ Americans
have become, as if reading fiction and poetry was the key to intellectual
growth and overall intelligence.
I
personally think I was much better prepared for my career as a
newspaper-magazine journalist by not pursuing fiction as either a creative
outlet or a source of entertainment.
*****
When
it comes to todayÕs society, people prefer fiction over fact in all aspects of
life. Just look at the messianic appeal of Barack Obama, who understands well that
he is simply portraying a movie-like representation of a Òworld leader.Ó ItÕs a
caricature of himself heÕs honing for the fiction-loving masses.
I
actually have a longtime journalist friend in Chicago who had a one-on-one
interview with Obama several years ago. He reported back to me, ÒIt was spooky.
HeÕs got this charismatic-smooth-as-butter-Antichrist-quality that sucks you
in, like it or not.Ó
*****
In
a newspaper op-ed piece last week on the Obama hysteria, syndicated Washington
Post columnist
Charles Krauthammer wrote, ÒAnd now, in the most amazing trick of all, a
silver-tongued freshman senator has found a way to sell hope (like Aqualina
found a way to sell reprocessed tap water and Google sells dictionary nouns to its
advertisers). To get it, you need only give him your vote. Barack Obama is
getting millions.
ÒThis
kind of sale is hardly new. Organized religion has been offering a similar
commodity—salvation—for millennia. Which is why the Obama campaign
has the feel of a religious revival with, as writer James Wolcott observed, a Ôsalvational
fervorÕ and Ôidealistic zeal divorced from any particular policy or cause and
chariot-driven by pure euphoria.
Ò
ÔWe are the hope of the future,Õ sayeth Obama. We can Ôremake this world as it
should be.Õ Believe in me, and I shall redeem not just you but your country—nay,
we can become Ôa hymn that will heal this nation, repair this world, and make
this time different from all the rest.Õ Ó
*****
Under
the headline ÒPoetic Justice,Ó a feature story in todayÕs Los Angeles Times told about prison inmates
inside the California MenÕs Colony who spend 12 hours a day rehearsing for
Shakespeare dramas in a London Shakespeare program that pairs convict cast
members with professional actors donating their time (including the likes of Al
Pacino, Richard Dreyfuss and Kenneth Branagh).
The
article reveals, ÒSome inmate actors say they were lured into the program by
Deborah Tobola, a resident artist and writer who serves as a facilitator in
Arts in Corrections. She offered them a choice: the Bard or Ôthe yard,Õ where
participating prisoners say they have to do more acting than they do in the
Shakespeare workshop just to survive the racial and social politics of prison
life. ÔWe should get Academy Awards,Õ cracks William Brown, 30.Ó
*****
Traveling
through Arizona last Friday on my way to southern California, I picked up a
copy of The Arizona Republic newspaper.
While
the front cover carried news of the deadly school shooting the day before at
Northern Illinois University, a light-hearted feature story on zombie movies in
the Arts section quoted the assistant director of the Arizona State University
School of Theater and Film as assessing:
ÒThe
audience can relate to zombies in a peculiar way of thinking. While most of us
cannot really imagine ourselves as vampires, homicidal, mask-wearing maniacs or
aliens from other worlds, we have all had days when we felt that shuffling,
dragging feeling, that monotony and distrust of other humans that zombies
embody.
ÒHow
often have we all said, ÔIÕm brain dead,Õ or, ÔIÕm dead tired?Õ Zombies are the
nth iteration of these feelings, and can often both scare us and make us laugh
at ourselves through identification.Õ
ÒSo
who are they, exactly? ÔTo me,Õ (prominent zombie film producer George) Romero
said, Ôif the zombies represent anything, theyÕre just sort of the working Joes.
TheyÕre the people nobody listens to, and then all of a sudden theyÕre too
strong.Õ Ó