Some preachers will tell you
that God just blanked out the minds of the Bible writers and picked up their
pen and did sort of a hocus-pocus kind of operation that caused them to write
what they did. This is complete baloney, of course.
As Jordan explains, ÒGod
reached into the library of the writersÕ individual vocabularies and out of
that chose words, and moved upon them in such a way that the words they wrote
down were the words He wanted them to write down, and the words came out of His
mouth through them onto the paper.
ÒThat does not imply He did
not use their faculties, their understandings, their capabilities, or their
vocabularies even. Peter, for example, was a man who used bad grammar. He was a
fisherman. If youÕve ever met commercial fishermen, they usually use pretty bad
grammar, and when you find Peter speaking in the Book of Acts, every now and
then he uses bad grammar.
Now Paul was a very educated
man. He was a rabbi. He used wonderful and perfect grammar. So, God in the
framework of those men . . . He didnÕt correct PeterÕs bad grammar
necessarily—I mean, canÕt God use PeterÕs bad grammar? Well, I better
hope He could! I canÕt get most of it right myself.Ó
*****
Luke tells the reader he
personally researched all the data in his book. He says in essence, ÒIÕve
checked all the facts youÕre going to read in here,Ó and yet the book of Luke
is inspired by God.
Jordan explains, ÒSo
inspiration doesnÕt mean that the writer is prohibited from doing personal
research. Inspiration does not deny the use of extra-biblical sources either.
Paul, for example, says in Acts 17:28, ÔFor in him we live, and move, and have
our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his
offspring.Õ
ÒNow that doesnÕt mean that God
Almighty put those words in the poetÕs mouth but it does mean God Almighty
accurately recorded it here and the source of the reference there—if you
go into history you can find it. In fact, IÕve got a book, I donÕt have on the
top of my tongue, but itÕs listed there. Paul also says in Titus 1 that, ÔThe Cretians
are liars, evil beasts and slow bellies, as even the old poet says.Õ Ó
*****
In the compilation of the books in the Old Testament itÕs
quite obvious that much data was taken from public records. In fact, there are
whole chapters in the book of Daniel that are records of public decrees.
I Chronicles 29:29, for
example, says, ÒNow the acts of David the king, first and last, behold, they
are written in the book of Samuel the seer, and in the book of Nathan the
prophet, and in the book of Gad the seer.Ó The term seer and prophet are the
same.
Jordan says, ÒWhat the verse
demonstrates is the nation Israel had extensive archives of public
record—they had a public library system—and whatÕs written in
Chronicles here is easy to verify, taken from well-known public records that
only prove the bona fide nature of the work that youÕre reading as being that
of a well-informed author.
ÒThere are at least 14
different source references quoted in I and II Chronicles. II Chronicles 9:29:
ÔNow the rest of the acts of Solomon, first and last, are they not written in
the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite,
and in the visions of Iddo the seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat?Õ
ÒYou see, thatÕs public
record that they can go read and check whatÕs being written down in the Scripture.
Chapter 13:22 says, ÔAnd the rest of the acts of Abijah, and his ways, and his
sayings, are written in the story of the prophet Iddo.Õ
ÒThe man who wrote them down
is basically doing what we do when we give footnotes—heÕs saying, ÔGo
check it and so-and-so and so-and-so.Õ You understand how you do that and
thatÕs what heÕs doing. And you know what you can do? You can go check it.
ÒSee, itÕs giving you the
understanding that the man who wrote Chronicles, and compiled this information
together, was a well-informed man using easily verifiable information that was
readily accessible to the public. I hope you donÕt have the idea that IsraelÕs
past was dim, dark and nobody writing anything or knowing anything.Ó
*****
Jordan was contacted recently
by a native American Indian (Wausau tribe) in Oregon who for many years
understood Òright divisionÓ of the Bible but didnÕt know there were any others
around the country who believed the same thing.
After meeting the man, who
has the Indian name Shadow Hawk, Jordan was given a gift of a handmade traditional
Òtalking stick,Ó made of feathers, beads, wood, etc. The idea of the stick is that
when a person holds it, he/she commands the full attention of the group and
everyone must listen.
The talking stick has a bead
pattern of 12 rows and Shadow Hawk told Jordan that in their tribeÕs understanding,
the twelve rows represent the 12 divisions of mankind that God made. The 12
rows are divided into 10 of one color and two of another (representing American
Indians).
Jordan explains, ÒMoses says
in Deut. 32 that God divided the nations, the sons of Adam, according to the
number of the children of Israel, which makes it a fascinating thing that the
Indians would have that same number!
ÒShadow Hawk also said that
in the Wausau language, their name for God—the God of creation—was
YEHO, which, as soon as you see it you know itÕs a contraction or a corruption
of Jehovah. You say, ÔWhere would these people out there with no connection to
Christianity or Judaism or the Bible get this stuff?Õ
ÒWhat it is is the remnants
of that truth that was spread out still staying in their ÔoriginsÕ ideas. ItÕs
fascinating that that information would still be in their culture. He said thereÕs
a bunch of things in the Wausau tribal culture that, after they learned the
Scripture, they could see where things that had come out of the Scripture still
hung with their pagan ideas and so forth.
Ò. . . You know, when you study
archaeology, you discover that every ancient civilization has a flood story in
its traditions. Now, if youÕre in an Indian culture youÕd be in canoes. If
youÕre in todayÕs culture youÕd think Noah was on the Queen Mary or
something—have you ever seen the ark in Sunday school stuff around here?
ÒAnother thing all
civilizations have is a creation story. A lot of them have a Ten Commandment
story too. ItÕs fascinating.Ó