Some preachers will tell you that God just blanked out the minds of the Bible writers and picked up their pen and did sort of a hocus-pocus kind of operation that caused them to write what they did. This is complete baloney, of course.

 

As Jordan explains, ÒGod reached into the library of the writersÕ individual vocabularies and out of that chose words, and moved upon them in such a way that the words they wrote down were the words He wanted them to write down, and the words came out of His mouth through them onto the paper.

 

ÒThat does not imply He did not use their faculties, their understandings, their capabilities, or their vocabularies even. Peter, for example, was a man who used bad grammar. He was a fisherman. If youÕve ever met commercial fishermen, they usually use pretty bad grammar, and when you find Peter speaking in the Book of Acts, every now and then he uses bad grammar.

 

Now Paul was a very educated man. He was a rabbi. He used wonderful and perfect grammar. So, God in the framework of those men . . . He didnÕt correct PeterÕs bad grammar necessarily—I mean, canÕt God use PeterÕs bad grammar? Well, I better hope He could! I canÕt get most of it right myself.Ó

 

*****

 

Luke tells the reader he personally researched all the data in his book. He says in essence, ÒIÕve checked all the facts youÕre going to read in here,Ó and yet the book of Luke is inspired by God.

 

Jordan explains, ÒSo inspiration doesnÕt mean that the writer is prohibited from doing personal research. Inspiration does not deny the use of extra-biblical sources either. Paul, for example, says in Acts 17:28, ÔFor in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.Õ

 

ÒNow that doesnÕt mean that God Almighty put those words in the poetÕs mouth but it does mean God Almighty accurately recorded it here and the source of the reference there—if you go into history you can find it. In fact, IÕve got a book, I donÕt have on the top of my tongue, but itÕs listed there. Paul also says in Titus 1 that, ÔThe Cretians are liars, evil beasts and slow bellies, as even the old poet says.Õ Ó

 

*****

 

 In the compilation of the books in the Old Testament itÕs quite obvious that much data was taken from public records. In fact, there are whole chapters in the book of Daniel that are records of public decrees.

 

I Chronicles 29:29, for example, says, ÒNow the acts of David the king, first and last, behold, they are written in the book of Samuel the seer, and in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the book of Gad the seer.Ó The term seer and prophet are the same.

 

Jordan says, ÒWhat the verse demonstrates is the nation Israel had extensive archives of public record—they had a public library system—and whatÕs written in Chronicles here is easy to verify, taken from well-known public records that only prove the bona fide nature of the work that youÕre reading as being that of a well-informed author.

 

ÒThere are at least 14 different source references quoted in I and II Chronicles. II Chronicles 9:29: ÔNow the rest of the acts of Solomon, first and last, are they not written in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in the visions of Iddo the seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat?Õ

 

ÒYou see, thatÕs public record that they can go read and check whatÕs being written down in the Scripture. Chapter 13:22 says, ÔAnd the rest of the acts of Abijah, and his ways, and his sayings, are written in the story of the prophet Iddo.Õ

 

ÒThe man who wrote them down is basically doing what we do when we give footnotes—heÕs saying, ÔGo check it and so-and-so and so-and-so.Õ You understand how you do that and thatÕs what heÕs doing. And you know what you can do? You can go check it.

 

ÒSee, itÕs giving you the understanding that the man who wrote Chronicles, and compiled this information together, was a well-informed man using easily verifiable information that was readily accessible to the public. I hope you donÕt have the idea that IsraelÕs past was dim, dark and nobody writing anything or knowing anything.Ó

 

*****

 

Jordan was contacted recently by a native American Indian (Wausau tribe) in Oregon who for many years understood Òright divisionÓ of the Bible but didnÕt know there were any others around the country who believed the same thing.

 

After meeting the man, who has the Indian name Shadow Hawk, Jordan was given a gift of a handmade traditional Òtalking stick,Ó made of feathers, beads, wood, etc. The idea of the stick is that when a person holds it, he/she commands the full attention of the group and everyone must listen.

 

The talking stick has a bead pattern of 12 rows and Shadow Hawk told Jordan that in their tribeÕs understanding, the twelve rows represent the 12 divisions of mankind that God made. The 12 rows are divided into 10 of one color and two of another (representing American Indians).

 

Jordan explains, ÒMoses says in Deut. 32 that God divided the nations, the sons of Adam, according to the number of the children of Israel, which makes it a fascinating thing that the Indians would have that same number!

ÒShadow Hawk also said that in the Wausau language, their name for God—the God of creation—was YEHO, which, as soon as you see it you know itÕs a contraction or a corruption of Jehovah. You say, ÔWhere would these people out there with no connection to Christianity or Judaism or the Bible get this stuff?Õ

 

ÒWhat it is is the remnants of that truth that was spread out still staying in their ÔoriginsÕ ideas. ItÕs fascinating that that information would still be in their culture. He said thereÕs a bunch of things in the Wausau tribal culture that, after they learned the Scripture, they could see where things that had come out of the Scripture still hung with their pagan ideas and so forth.

 

Ò. . . You know, when you study archaeology, you discover that every ancient civilization has a flood story in its traditions. Now, if youÕre in an Indian culture youÕd be in canoes. If youÕre in todayÕs culture youÕd think Noah was on the Queen Mary or something—have you ever seen the ark in Sunday school stuff around here?

 

ÒAnother thing all civilizations have is a creation story. A lot of them have a Ten Commandment story too. ItÕs fascinating.Ó