I
was the cook again this week at the elderly house, meaning I was also the one
in charge of answering the phone, getting to the doorbell and sorting the mail.
As
soon as I saw the cover story of this weekÕs Time Magazine, fresh-delivered for one of our male residents, I
just knew Rick Warren would be named among ÒThe Time 100: The WorldÕs Most
Influential People.Ó
Sure
enough, there was his glowing write-up on p. 112 in the ÒActivistÓ section, next
to a full-page painted portrait designed to make him look like a Catholic saint
complete with the uplifted right hand and outstretched fingers in the Baal
symbol.
The
article confirmed there are Òthousands of pastors whom Warren trains and
millions of seekers who follow his every word. Which means he is right where he
wants to be.Ó
*****
Of
course, this is all to be expected in a post-Bible world where itÕs men who
tell you how to be a Òman of God,Ó not God. And with Warren, all you get is New
Age-inspired hooey.
In a Q & A he conducted last month with the
popular New Age website Beliefnet, Warren admitted, ÒI'm actually having a
Passover Seder tomorrow night. People never need to doubt why I do what I do,
even when associating with people gets me in all kinds of hot water.Ó
He then bragged about how he had Òwebbed feetÓ
from dunking a record 800 people in his baptismal pool at Saddleback Church in
a five-hour period.
Warren said, ÒIt had to be a record. You know,
it says in Acts that at the day of Pentecost, 3,000 were baptized and added to
the church that day. We had 2,400 added to the church that day. The world
belongs to Saddleback. When we started Saddleback, it was a white suburban
church. We speak 65 different languages. It's the United Nations. I baptized an
Egyptian General; I baptized probably 50 or 60 nationalities.Ó
Most
revealing of all, when asked the question, ÒBut as long as you're working with
groups of other faiths, where do you draw the line?Ó, Warren answered, in part:
ÒYou're probably not going to convince a Muslim to change his views, and he's
probably not going to convince you to change your views about Christ. I am
interested in interfaith projects. Can we work together on issues that apply to
humanity like caring for the sick, assisting the poor, educating the next
generation, ending corruption, and promoting reconciliation? I don't have to
agree with you and you don't have to agree with me on everything, but I'm not
insisting that you compromise your beliefs.Ó
Of
course, WarrenÕs ÒconvictionsÓ represent perfectly the historical definition of
the philosophy of apostasy: ÒCanÕt we all just get along?!Ó
As
author R. Dawson Barlow so aptly puts it in his 2005 book The Apostasy of the Christian Church, ÒThe buzz word of this
growing number of people is, ÔWell, you have to do whatever is right for you.Õ The conclusion is that nothing
is really right or wrong, but what is right and and wrong for me. This is nothing but a denial of any absolute truths.Ó
*****
Just
as untold thousands upon thousands of so-called ÒChristian leadersÓ today follow
WarrenÕs Purpose-Driven Life as their
authority for all-things-ministry, IsraelÕs religious leaders during the time
of Christ did the same thing with their Rabbi-concocted Talmud (designated as
Òthe literary reservoir of Rabbinic JudaismÓ and added to the Sacred Literature
of Israel during the Hellenistic Age--250-200 BC--in Jewish history).
Barlow
explains, ÒThe ÔreligionÕ of our Lord Jesus Christ was that of Judaism, a faith
whose ONLY foundation was the Word of God, which was called the Torah. In contrast
to that, the religious leaders of our LordÕs day belonged to another (though it
adamantly claimed to be the same) religion that was based on the Talmud, which
was manÕs addition to the Word of God.
ÒI
am perfectly aware that these words will cause an uproar. It will not be as
seemingly caustic as the reaction that will come with the exact same charge
will be laid at the feet of Christendom. I
reiterate, Christianity is a faith in the Word of God only—Christendom is
a totally different ÔreligionÕ than that and it rests upon the tenants of
paganism, philosophy and augmentations to the Bible.Ó
*****
Barlow continues, ÒAfter the Talmud was added to the Torah, the religious
leaders began to put the emphasis on the Talmud. Little time passed before the true
test of orthodoxy was oneÕs views on the Talmud, not the Torah. . .
ÒThis
then is the reason for the caustic and acrimonious relationship between the
Lord Jesus and the religious leaders of His day! It is then abundantly clear
that our Lord and the Pharisees were completely polarized in their theological
stance, and that they did not, in fact, believe the same doctrines . . .
ÒOur
Lord, in the Sermon on the Mount and throughout his earthly ministry, was most
certainly not speaking out against Mosaic Judaism. Rather, He was castigating
the apostate ÔJewÕs religionÕ which had replaced
the Word of God with the thoughts, traditions and philosophies of men . . .
ÒChrist
and the Pharisees were indeed at irreconcilable odds with each other. The issue
that separated them allowed for no common ground between them because they
believed in two different authorities . . . The Jewish religious leaders, while
giving lip service to, and expressing belief in the Torah, actually, and
practically believed in the supremacy of the Talmud. . .
ÒTo
those ÔChristiansÕ of our day who would reply, ÔAll this doesnÕt really matter,Õ we reply, with great
passion, it mattered a great deal to our Lord Jesus, who refused to budge or
compromise on this truth.
ÒHe
knew it was blasphemous—while anemic philosophers of our day, with
wispy-eyed
Countenances
still reply—ÔI just do not see the point.Õ That irreconcilable, philosophical gap caused the avowed enemies of our
Lord to blindly reject Him and that was the reason they formulated their plan
to murder Him. It mattered then, and it matters now with no less intensity.Ó
*****
When
John the Baptist came on the scene he had to tell the people, ÒIÕm not the
Messiah,Ó precisely because they had gotten so far away from the Torah as to not
have the ability to recognize who the Messiah was or wasnÕt. John was forced to
remind them, ÔI come to bear witness to the light.Õ
Jordan
explains, ÒWhat was going on in Israel
is what goes on in religion. They had mistaken the leaders of the nation and
had made gods out of them. TheyÕd put them in the position of being
deified—making them the supreme authority in their life and John is
reminding them what they missed.
ÒThe
world didnÕt recognize its Creator. It didnÕt know Him. ThatÕs the unspeakable
tragedy where they canÕt even recognize their own Creator. ThatÕs where the
world was! By the way, thatÕs the condition of the Gentile world all through IsraelÕs
history.Ó
*****
In Acts
14, Paul and Barnabas were actually mistaken for the popular gods Mercury and
Jupiter after they came on the scene and Paul healed a man who hadnÕt been able
to walk since birth.
The
passage reads, ÒAnd when the people saw what Paul had done, they lifted up
their voices, saying in the speech of Lycaonia, The gods are come down to us in
the likeness of men.
[12] And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and Paul, Mercurius, because he
was the chief speaker.
[13] Then the priest of Jupiter, which was before their city, brought
oxen and garlands unto the gates, and would have done sacrifice with the
people.
[14] Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent
their clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out,
[15] And saying, Sirs, why do ye these things? We also are men of like
passions with you, and preach unto you that ye should turn from these vanities
unto the living God, which made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things
that are therein.Ó
*****
Jordan
explains, ÒPaulÕs telling these heathen exactly
what John had to tell Israel. Now, in Acts 17:22, PaulÕs speaking to some
pagans who were of the intellectual crowd and he just calls them theyÕre a
bunch of superstitious, religious ignoramuses.Ó
The
passage reads, Ò(For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent
their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing.)
[22] Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' hill, and said, Ye men of
Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious.
[23] For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar
with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly
worship, him declare I unto you.Ó
Jordan
says, ÒTheyÕre at Athens up on Mars Hill and the Athenians were the great
philosophers of the world. If you go into any university to the English lit and
humanities department, youÕll see that the reputation of these people PaulÕs
talking to here was that they were the brightest, greatest brains humanityÕs
ever produced.
ÒAnd
Western civilization, in large measure, since the days of the philosophers of Greece,
have simply just taken the ideas of these people, which by the way, were
largely plagiarized.
ÒYouÕve
heard of AristotleÕs Golden Mean? With Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, the quest
was for the Ôsunum bonoÕ—the supreme good. And Socrates said, ÔWell, you
donÕt want to be excessive in either good or bad. You want to have that level
balanced life in it.Õ You know where he got that? He stole that out of the Book
of Ecclesiastes? Socrates literally paraphrased what Solomon said but never
gave Solomon credit for it.
ÒEvery
major philosophy of the world has its roots in the wisdom literature of the Old
Testament. Looking at verse 18, if you take the disciples of Epicures and
disciples of Zeno (which is where Stoicism comes from) the Epicureans—thatÕs
the Hugh HeffnerÕs of the ancient world, itÕs, ÔLetÕs eat, drink and be merry
for tomorrow we die.Õ The Stoics were the stiff upper-lippers—you know
the, ÔWell, you endeavor to preserve,Õ to quote the Indian in the Clint
Eastwood movie.
ÒHundreds
and hundreds of years before these guys were born that information had been
studied, examined, put on the record and found to be worthless. But these guys
picked it up and made a career out of it.Ó