In the 1500s, England was ruled by Henry VIII. HeÕs the one
who cut the heads off his wives when they didnÕt do what he wanted. HeÕs the one
who finally threw the pope out of England so he could marry another woman.
As the king from 1509-1547, Henry was very antagonistic, not
just to Rome, but to Protestants. It was during that time that much of the Bible,
including William TyndaleÕs translation, the Matthews Bible and the Great Bible,
was done.
William Tyndale finished his translation in Saxony (on the
continent) because Henry, who had banned everything Tyndale wrote, had falsely
accused him of sedition and Tyndale had to flee England to keep the king from
cutting his head off.
ÒSaints can be kind of wise as serpents and harmless as doves,Ó
observes Jordan. ÒAt one point Tyndale had finished the revision of his
translation and wanted to publish but had run out of money, so a merchant friend of his in London went to the archbishop and said,
ÔI have a way to purchase some 2,000 of TyndaleÕs Bibles—we could purchase
them and then burn them.Õ
ÒSo they purchased through this emissary all these old
Tyndale bibles that Tyndale wanted to replace anyway. The archbishop buys them,
brings them to London, burns them and makes a big thing out of it. The kingÕs
ever so happy. Tyndale takes the money and reprints his revised edition. Of
course, the merchant friend didnÕt let on that he was a friend of TyndaleÕs; he
just went ahead and made the business deal.Ó
*****
After Henry VIII died, his nephew became King Edward VI. Edward
was a ÔLive and Let LiveÕ kind of a guy. Bloody Mary took over after EdwardÕs
death and she was as rabidly Roman Catholic as anyone could be. The Catholics,
in the meantime, had set up on the mainland, where the Douay-Rheims translation
came from.
Ignatius Loyola founded the Jesuits. Loyola was a general in
the army of Ferdinand Isabella, the one who financed Christopher Columbus, and he
was also rabidly Roman Catholic. Much of the Spanish Inquisition took place
under his nose.
ÒLoyola was wounded in the fighting to expel the Muslims from
Europe. He couldnÕt be a soldier anymore so he was casting about, ÔWell what
should I do for the good of man and the glory of God,Õ so he comes up with the
ideaÉby that time the Protestants had spread all over Europe and the papacy was
sort of behind the scenes.
ÒIn 1454, Constantinople fell (Istanbul). The Ottoman Empire
comes in and takes over the Byzantine Empire. All of the eastern church, the Muslims
came in and took them over and the Byzantines flee to Europe.
ÒFor the first time in a millennium, Greek language,
manuscripts, culture and understanding comes into Europe. The Romans (Latin)
had pushed them out. When they did that, Erasmus is there. All of this original
language and Greek understanding comes in and thereÕs this confluence of all
this education, thinking and opportunity. It was an exciting time.
ÒThe pope was beginning to wake up: ÔWeÕre in trouble!Õ
Two-thirds of Europe is Protestant and the other third is leaning that way.
Loyola says, ÔI know what we need to do. WeÕll found the Jesuits for the
specific purpose of subverting the Protestant Reformation.Õ ThatÕs what the
Jesuits were for. That was their charter.
ÒOne of LoyolaÕs goals was to train 300 priests to send back
to England to re-establish Romanism in England. But because the English have been
translating this bible into English, you know, Wycliffe comes along and he
takes all of these disparate pieces of translations. YouÕve got a new language
developing. He puts this complete English bible together, begins to publish it
and Wycliffe was a statesman. HeÕd been a member of parliament, called on by
the king of England to help. He was a well-known figure.
ÒSo Loyola says, ÔWhat we need to do is get us an English bible,Õ
and they go to Rheims France and start translating the bible. They also set out
a place and theyÕre training 300 priests theyÕre going to send back.
*****
ÒBloody MaryÕs over here chopping the heads off of people.
She literally beheaded some of the great saints of the Protestant Reformation
in England. And then she croaks.
ÒAfter she dies, Queen Elizabeth comes on the throne and she
was as much the other way as Mary was that way. She was rabidly Protestant, so
now all the Catholics have to uproot and go. The 300 dudes being trained,
forget it, they canÕt come. Douay-Rheims is a failed effort.
*****
From 1558-1603 you have this golden era of English
accomplishments and moving forward under Queen ElizabethÕs reign. When she died
there were a whole bunch of different bible translations and before she died she actually sent to
parliament a proposed legislation to authorize one final English translation
that would gather together all the bibles that had been done and make out of
them just one final acceptable English translation.
ÒBefore that passed she died, but it was on the books as
being a proposal,Ó says Jordan. ÒJames the sixth of Scotland was born in 1566
in the summer. He was crowned King of Scotland while he was a baby.
ÒBy the way, his coronation sermon was preached by John Knox,
one of the great saints of the old school in church history. He preached his
coronation message. I say that so you understand it came out of a strongly Protestant
heritage.
ÒNow, 36 years later he became James I of England in July of
1603 after the death of Queen Elizabeth. James, when they talk about him being ugly,
vile and vulgar; when they say vulgar, they donÕt mean cursing, they mean
plain, ordinary.
ÒWhen you see pictures of James he was kind of a reddish-looking
faced guy. Looks sort of like a red-headed stepchild kind of cartoon character.
He was a skinny guy. He was married, had kids, so forth, a family man, but he
was nerdy, as we would say. He was a bookworm. He wasnÕt the warrior-type ready
to pick up the sword and slay the dragon. He was a poet. He translated. He was
educated and fluent in languages.
ÒPeople who would come in and meet him as a child (7-10 years
old), and the ambassadors from France, for example, would go away and say how
fluent he was in French and then how he met the Italian ambassador and that he
could speak as equally in Italian as he could in French and spoke both as well
as he did English.
ÒIn 1584, he wrote ÔThe Essays of a Pretense into the Divine
Art of Poetry.Õ He wrote, ÔA Fruitful Meditation on the 6th, 8th,
9th and 10th Verses of Chapter 20 of the Book of the Revelation.Õ
ThatÕs an interesting thing to write. In 1589 he wrote, ÔA Meditation on the
First Book of the Chronicles of the Kings.Õ In 1591 he wrote, ÔHis MajestyÕs
Poetical Exercises.Õ In 1598 he wrote, ÔThe Law of Free Monarchies.Õ In 1597, he wrote a book called
ÔDemonology,Õ in which he denounces homosexuality quite clearly.
ÒHe wrote a book for his son, ÔBasilikon
Doran,Õ which became an international best-seller, something that didnÕt happen
a lot in that era.
ÒI say all that so you understand that before James became King
of England he had a background in thinking and understanding and knowledge and
awareness of doctrine, things that pertain to Scripture. He was a man who
enjoyed the study of Scripture. He actually had translated a Psalter, a book
with some of the psalms in it, himself.Ó
*****
When it came time for James to assume the throne, he left
Scotland and traveled down to London and on the way there was a Millenary
Convention. One thousand preachers
had signed a petition to the new king asking for consideration of a long list
of grievances, suggestions and things that needed to be done both in the church
and in the culture. He met with those preachers at Hampton Court. They used the
address because of its massive size.
One of the things that came out of the meeting was JamesÕ
agreement they would produce one final translation of the Scripture. BancroftÕs
Rules were the rules by which the translators had to operate. James selected
out the best of the available scholars.
Jordan says, ÒYou have to understand you have a group of
people who first came out of Bloody MaryÕs persecutions. They go into the
bright light of Queen Elizabeth for all that time. Well, when you come out of
persecution into liberty, what do you do? You tend to excel.
ÒSo there had been this 50-year period where they had
advancements and learning. And you know how Christians are. If youÕre giving
them liberty and advancements and learning, thereÕs also fighting: ÔWell, I
think it says this. No, it says this.Õ LetÕs be honest, thatÕs how we are, but
thatÕs part of the exercise of learning.
ÒIf we didnÕt disagree with one another, weÕd never find out
something was right and something was wrong. You ever thought about that? A
verse in Corinthians says, ÔFor there must be also heresies among you,
that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.Õ
ÒThe way you try something is you take and cross examine it.
So when you look at controversy that way, not as a destructive mean, nasty,
personal thing, but as the natural course of growing, all of a sudden it isnÕt
quite so bad.
ÒThe Geneva Bible, for example, had become the most popular
English bible of the time. To translate it they went to Geneva, headquarters of
John Calvin. CalvinÕs son-in-law headed the group that translated it and the
people in most of Protestantism made it real popular because it was the right
size and it had a lot of study notes. But the study notes were all extremely
Calvinistic. So the Calvinists loved it, and if you werenÕt a Calvinist, you
didnÕt like it.
ÒBy the way, King James was not a Calvinist! In the book he
wrote to his son, he warned him about the influences of Calvinism. One of the
reasons you will discover that so many people who oppose the KJV today, people
like James White, for example, are five-point Calvinists.
ÒIf you go through a list of people who are on the other
side, in the quote intellectual-scholarly (thatÕs what they think of
themselves) and ask who are they and what they believe, youÕll find
consistently the overwhelming majority are extreme Calvinists.
ÒNow why would they not like the KJV? Because they had a
bible that was the most popular bible of the time that the KJV was written
specifically to replace! The BishopsÕ Bible was supposed to do it but it
didnÕt. The KJV did!
ÒBy 1640, that was the last year the Geneva Bible was
printed. In less than 30 years, the Authorized Version had supplanted very
other English version. None of them were printed again as popularly to be
distributed. The KJV was the bible that took over the market.
ÒThe pilgrims, when they came over on the Mayflower, they
brought a Geneva Bible because they came before 1611.
ÒKing James authorized the founding of Jamestown, Va. That
town was founded in honor of him and he authorized it and when you read the
dedication, what he wrote had everything to do with the gospel. So hereÕs a guy
interested in seeing the gospel get out.
ÒIn JamesÕ book ÔDemonology,Õ published in Edinburgh in 1597,
he wrote, ÔThe fearful abounding at this time in this country of these
detestable slaves of the devil, the witches or enchanters, hath moved me,
beloved reader, to dispatch, in post this following treatise of mine . . .
without regeneration, men slip into slavery and into the horrors of hell. Men
have obtained to a great perfection of learning and yet remaining overbased, alas, of the spirit of regeneration and fruits
thereof, tread upon the slippery and uncertain scale of curiosity, becoming bondslaves to their mortal enemy and their knowledge. For
all they pursue therof is nothing increased except in
knowing evil and the horrors of hell for punishment thereof. Christians do not
demand revelations from God, visions, or inquire into things which He hath not
revealed to us by the Scriptures. It becometh us to be content with a humble
ignorance, they being things not necessary for our salvation. Many of the
witchesÕ art are of such silly illusions like to the little transubstantiational
god in the papist mass that I could never believe in.Õ
ÒThat would get him in a little trouble, see? Now he was the
King of Scotland writing that in a book that became an international
best-seller. You think, ÔOkay, would he have a target on his back?!Õ So all IÕm
trying to get you to understand is that he was a Bible-believer. He did not
know everything we know.
ÒHe writes, ÔProphecies and visions are now ceased. All of
the spirits that appear in these forms are evil. Two symptoms of devil
possession are incredible strength and speaking of sundry languages, which the
patient is known by them that were inquired with him never to have learned.Õ
ÒYou thought tongue-talking started at the Azusa Street
Mission in 19-whatever. Old James is saying, ÔThey were doing that over here
and itÕs of the devil!Õ
ÒMy point to you is James believed Ôthe whole Scripture was
dictated by GodÕs Spirit. The scripture must be an infallible ground to all
true Christians.Õ
ÒIn 1605, when he visited Oxford for first time, they put, at
his request, Bible verses all over the place. DonÕt fall into the idea that he
was nut case; some fowl-mouthed cussing guy over here looking for some child to
bed. ThatÕs not who he was. He was a Protestant; a Bible Believer.
ÒWhen he wrote his son in the book for his boy, he said,
ÔPraying God as you are regenerated and born in Him anew, so you may rise to
Him and be sanctified in Him forever with garments washed in the shed blood of
the lamb. Remember, my son, salvation is the free gift of God, as Paul sayeth.Õ
Ó
*****
When James was 13 years old, as the young king in Scotland,
he had a distant cousin, Esme Stuart, a French Catholic, who came to Scotland
to befriend King James and seek to convert him into Catholicism.
As an account reads, ÒThough still in his early teens, James
used his most persuasive arguments on his cousin, causing him to become a
Protestant convert. He was to die a Protestant. Esme wrote a document which
Ôcondemned in detail many aspects of Catholic belief and practice.Õ
Jordan says, ÒThe dudeÕs a soul-winner at 13 years old,
preaching the gospel. In March of 1604, James told the Protestant clergy, ÔBe
more careful diligent than you have been to win souls for God. Where you have
been in many ways sluggish before, now wake yourselves up again with a new
diligence at this point.Õ
ÒYou say, ÔWow, whatÕs got him so fired up?!Õ When he
established the colony in Virginia, it was Ôfor the propagating of the
Christian religion to such people as yet live in darkness and miserable
ignorance of the knowledge of the worship of God.Õ
ÒHe pleaded that, ÔThe true Word of God and the service of
God in the Christian faith be preached, planted and used in the new colony of
Virginia. The inhabitants of those parts live in utter ignorance of divine
worship and are completely deprived of the knowledge and solace of the Word of
God and probably will remain and end their days in such ignorance unless such a
great evil is cared for as soon as possible. Therefore, we ought to end that
out of the love for the glory of God and the desire to work for the good and
the salvation of souls to those parts. Dedicate yourselves to and perform the
ministry of preaching the Word of God in those parts.Õ
*****
In a book to his son, James made it clear, ÒAs to the
apocryphal books I omit them because I am no papist.Ó Jordan says, ÒThatÕs good
advice from a dad to his boy. He wrote his boy about godliness, holiness, a
fear and knowledge of God, decidedly pure and chaste conduct. Among JamesÕ good
qualities, one contemporary said, ÔNone shine more brightly than the chasteness
of his light which he hath preserved without stain, down to the present time,
contrary to the example of almost all his ancestors.Õ Ó
JamesÕ writes his son about how a man should carry a Òcertain
natural modesty and kindness. He wears his hair short, about food and clothing
he does not care, I wish therefore someone has a single coat or one living
before others have doubles of plurality.Ó
Jordan says, ÒThat doesnÕt sound like the description 50
years later of King James being this prurient-interested person. He wrote in
his book ÔDemonologyÕ that Ôevil is never to be done that good may happen.
Sodomy and witchcraft are horrible crimes. When choosing friends, my son, guard
against corrupt lads, effeminate ones, eschew to be effeminate in your
clothes.Õ
ÒThe dude was pretty clear to his son. He said, ÔBe ever
careful to prefer the gentlest nature and enjoy frequently hearing the Word of
God.Õ
*****
Sir John Oglander said about James
Òhe was the best scholar and wisest prince for general knowledge that ever
England knew.Ó
Jordan says, ÒThatÕs probably a common view of him from
contemporaries but he was also a widely persecuted king. His official motto
when he took the crown was ÔBlessed are the peacemakers,Õ yet he fought with
the Catholics most of his life.
ÒWhile he was king in Scotland he was confronted by a Roman
Catholic conspiracy called the Spanish Blanks, in January, 1593. Basically a
bunch of Jesuit priests, Father William Wright and crowd, instigated a plot to
bring 5,000 Spanish troops to Scotland to take over the kingdom. It was
discovered it was thwarted but it set JamesÕ political bent—they didnÕt
like him.
ÒIn The Gunpowder Plot of 1605, 13 conspirators were after
James and their goal was to restore the Catholic religion in England. In 1603,
there was a big plague in London in which 30,000 people died. The Catholics
fomented the idea that the plague was God judging the Protestants.
ÒThe superstition of all that gets to going and so, in order
to discourage that, here comes James out of the shoot and he begins to attack
the Roman system as being superstitious. As he does that, these Jesuit
terrorists begin to plot his destruction.
ÒHereÕs what Guy Faulks said in his
trial: ÔMany have heard King James say at the table that the pope is the
Antichrist, which he wished to prove to anyone who believed the opposite.Õ
ÒAnd it was that opposition that James took to the front that
caused these guys to say, ÔHey, we need to get rid of King James.Õ They filled
the basement of Parliament with gunpowder. They were going to do it in November
of Ô05. Now what happened is it was discovered. James immediately condemns the
Jesuits as a generation of vipers and things go on from there.
*****
ÒHe lived all of his reign under the threat of personal
attack by Jesuit terrorists. One of the first accounts of that I ever read was
a story of a young girl who was a chamber maid; a servant in the castle.
ÒFor King JamesÕ protection, when he went to bed at night
bodyguards would slide a bolt through the door to secure it so heÕd be in his
chamber locked from the inside.
ÒBut with the bodyguards bribed to go away, terrorists
managed to have that mechanism disabled and the bar taken out, so the door,
rather than being locked, was open. This little girl found out about the plot
and she ran up into the kingÕs chamber and warned him of what was happening.
They discovered the door couldnÕt be locked to keep the assassins out.
ÒThis young girl goes and takes her arm and puts it through
the hasp on the door and uses her arm to hold the door locked while James gets
away. And this young girl literally has her arm broken and severed in half and
dies from the wounds.
ÒImagine a guy who can inspire that kind of loyalty out of
young believers. As I said, 50 years after his death, heÕs being hounded and
claimed to be a homosexual by professed Roman Catholic antagonists.
ÒI just want you to understand King James was not this
nefarious guy or this detached, uninterested person. When you find out who he
really was, he turns out to be a Bible believer, a scholar in his own right and
someone who the Jesuits targeted specifically for destruction over and over.
ÒHis crowning achievement was probably, during his reign, the
term Great Britain was applied to the British Commonwealth. He did have quite a
reign.Ó
*****
In the first decade or more after its introduction in 1611,
the King James Authorized Version was simply entitled, ÒThe Holy Bible,Ó and
thatÕs all you read: ÒThe Holy Bible containing the Old Testament and the New
Testament.Ó
Jordan explains, ÒThey did not put peopleÕs names on the
Bible. King James did not say, ÔThis is my Bible.Õ Where King James came from
is in the dedication. The translators dedicated it to the king and
consequently, as Ecclesiastes says, ÔWhere the word of the king is there is
power.Õ
ÒBy the way, itÕs interesting that many of the English bibles
that have been translated down through history--many of the influential bibles
in the line of the Textus Receptus--have been translated under the reigns of
good kings, including Alfred the Great in 899 with the Saxon Bible and Alfonso
XIII of Spain when the Protestant bible came out. You find under the reign of
some of these monarchs who were favorable to the Scripture the peaking of
translations for those nations. And thatÕs not a fluke. ThatÕs part of the way
things operate.
ÒYouÕd be well to look into some of these things and enjoy
the details. You need to be able to look across history and spot some of your
kinfolk.
ÒKing James did oversee the setting up of the most extensive
translating process of any bible in history. With three separate locations, two
separate translating groups checking the translations of the others and then
editorial committees bringing them together; bringing in all of the peoplesÕ
knowledge and the whole country and fine-tuning the thing, going over all the
controversial issues. And they were not producing a new translation. They were
also not trying to produce an easier-to-read translation.Ó