The common lie through the ages is that the books of the Bible werenÕt decided on until the third and fourth century when a bunch of Church Council people got together.

 

As my pastor, Richard Jordan, says, ÒThatÕs hogwash. ItÕs just rank unbelief. Before 70 A.D., your whole New Testament was written, copied out, distributed and collated together in one book and understood to be the Word of God.

 

ÒAnd there was a special group of people in the church (the Body of Christ) at that time making sure no one made any mistakes and everything was understood to be authoritative. That was one of the jobs of the prophets.

 

ÒYou know how Paul said that ÔGod hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachersÕ?

 

ÒDid you ever wonder what those prophets were supposed to do? ThatÕs not talking about Old Testament prophets; thatÕs prophets God gave to the church the Body of Christ.

 

ÒDid you ever read over in I Cor.14: 37, and I quote this verse all the time, ÔIf any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the LordÕ?

 

ÒOne of the things a prophet in the church was to do was identify a book Paul wrote and say, ÔThatÕs the Word of God.Õ

 

ÒLook in I Cor. 5:9 where Paul writes the Corinthians and he talks about how in a previous epistle he wrote Ônot to company with fornicators.Õ Well, where is that epistle? ItÕs not in your Bible. Is your Bible missing a book? No.

 

ÒWell, what about the epistle to the Corinthians that he wrote before he wrote I Corinthians? ShouldnÕt I Corinthians really be II Corinthians, or at least I Corinthians B? No. The letter to the Laodiceans Paul talks about in Colossians 4:16 is not in your Bible either.

 

ÒPaul wrote a lot of things that arenÕt in the Bible. Why? Because God didnÕt write them. Just because Paul wrote it, didnÕt make it Scripture. God wrote it, and thatÕs what made it Scripture.

 

ÒYou read all this stuff going around last year with that Da Vinci Code book and all that stuff about the lost books of the Bible; the books of Thomas and Philip and stuff. Yawn.

 

ÒI read that stuff in the Õ60s, folks. I read the Gospel of Judas when I was in school in the Õ60s. They didnÕt just find that! That was just a big hullabaloo they were making.

 

In I Corinthians 11:25, when Paul writes, ÒThis cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me,Ó heÕs quoting from Luke 22:19, demonstrating that he had a copy of Luke in his possession.

 

*****

 

Jordan says, ÒWhen somebody says, ÔWell, you guys make too much of Paul; you donÕt really study the rest of the Bible,Õ realize that it would be impossible to study PaulÕs epistles without studying the rest of the Bible.

 

ÒThere are so many places in PaulÕs epistles where heÕll make a point, using an allusion, or some information from the Old Testament and the rest of Scripture, to illustrate and amplify a point heÕs making.

 

ÒYou could never make the Bible anything other that what it is, and thatÕs one whole book. Now, when we Ôrightly divideÕ it, weÕre not chopping it up. ItÕs one book; itÕs got one author who uses 40 different human authors over almost 2,000 years of time.

 

ÒThere are things that are written back in Genesis that you really canÕt understand the importance of them until you come way over to late in the New Testament. And when you read over here in the New Testament something thatÕs written, youÕll say, ÔYou know, what He wrote there, He had that in mind back there when He wrote Genesis,Õ and youÕll see it.

 

ÒYouÕll say, ÔWait a minute, Matthew or John, Peter or Paul, they didnÕt live back there; they lived over here. But whoever wrote back here—say Moses—knew what those men were going to know!Õ

 

ÒThere were things that werenÕt revealed until Paul—nobody knew about them until Paul came of the scene—and yet these men wrote things back there (in the Old Testament) that tell you, ÔWhoever wrote this knew all of that was coming.Õ

 

ÒYou see, that just proves to you there had to be one real author, and that he was an ET; an extra-terrestrial, outside of time and over time. God did that.

 

ÒThatÕs why when you just read and study the Bible, it demonstrates itself to you to be the Word of God. IÕve read other religious literature—the Koran IÕve read through five times; just sat and read it—and they donÕt commend themselves to you like that at all. IÕve got a Muslim neighbor who can quote the Koran in Arabic but he doesnÕt know what heÕs quoting!Ó