During the Middle Ages, a mixture of biblical
teaching and Aristoliean philosophy developed known as scholasticism. There was an attempt to reconcile divine revelation
with AristotleÕs human speculations.
ÒThey developed a methodology in the academy
and thatÕs where systematic theology came from,Ó says Jordan. ÒAquinas, these
guys, based on AristotleÕs Golden Mean—the greatest virtue—and they
develop a systematic way of explaining God.Ó
Aristotle was a student of Plato, who was
taught by Socrates. In my Dummies book
on world history, it says, ÒSocrates was a critic. He lived to question, to
pick apart assumptions . . . Plato depicted Socrates as intent on convincing
his fellow Athenians to reexamine their ideas about right and wrong. PlatoÕs
writings describe Socrates using a technique thatÕs been called the Socratic method ever since: Socrates asks the person he is talking to for
a definition of a broad concept (such as piety or justice) and then tries to
get the person to contradict himself with his answer.Ó
*****
Time is the way you measure the distance
between phenomenon and events. If thereÕs no movement, thereÕs no time, which
is why PlatoÕs idea that eternity is timeless doesnÕt work.
ÒEternity isnÕt that there is no time; eternity
is that time never ends—it just keeps going on and on and on because thereÕs
event, event, event, event,Ó says Jordan. ÒSome time we get the idea that, ÔWell,
in eternity thereÕs no time.Õ Time is the way you experience whatÕs going on
and when God created time, time is the phenomenal event in which all the other
creation is experienced.Ó
*****
Fundamental to the intended literal
interpretation of Scripture is making the distinction between the earthly program
God gave Israel and the heavenly program given Christians, the Church the Body
of Christ.
Jordan explains, ÒIf IÕm looking for the
life of Israel, IÕm going to look for physical institutions—a literal,
visible, physical nation with a literal, visible, physical priesthood with
literal, visible, physical ordinances, and identifying marks and signs, and
land and a government.
ÒWhen IÕm looking for the Body of Christ, am
I looking for land, or buildings, or organizations? IÕm looking for some
spiritual life.
ÒThat
right there, in my own personal opinion about all of this, is probably the single
most important issue that nobody in the history books pays any attention to.
Almost nobody.Ó
*****
Covenant Reform theologian and Calvinist
preacher R.C. Sproul, who is a huge, huge name on national Christian radio,
hanging out with other Christian radio celebs such as John McArthur and James D.
Kennedy, gives this doctrinal statement on one of his websites:
ÒWe
believe the (Christian) church is essentially Israel. We believe the answer to
the question, ÔWhat is a Jew?Õ is, ÔHere we are.Õ We deny that the church is
GodÕs Plan B. We deny that we are living in GodÕs redemptive parenthesis. We
are the Israel of God, princes with God and the ecclesia; the set apart ones.Ó
Now, as a Gentile, Sproul is obviously aware
heÕs not a descendant of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The term Jew in the Bible is ALWAYS a descendant
of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob—ethnic Israel. Gentiles are never referred to
as Jews in the Bible.
Jordan explains, ÒWhen
Sproul reads Jew, he says, ÔOh, we wonÕt take that literally. WeÕre gonna
spiritualize it. WeÕre gonna study it allegorically. ThatÕs really an allegory.Õ
ÒAnd that difference in approach to the Bible
. . . R.C. Sproul is a saved Gentile, a member of the Church the Body of Christ,
but he doesnÕt know the fullness of what that means to him because heÕs caught
in a system that wonÕt let him study the Bible literally.
ÒA lot of folks in the conservative fundamentalist
camp do the same thing. They get on the TV and say, ÔJesus said youÕre going to
receive power after the Holy Ghost has come upon you and be witnesses unto me
in Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem. ThatÕs your hometown.Õ They all say that.
ÒThe problem is if you read two verses beyond
that verse in the Book of Acts, the angel looks at those guys and says to them,
ÔYe men of Galilee, why stand ye here gazing?Õ
ÒYou
see, itÕs easy to fall into the trap if your system needs you to do it, and the
greatest motivator to not take the Bible literally and to allegorize it is that
it helps your system out, and thatÕs something you got to be real careful
about.
ÒThe first and probably the most fundamental
element of dispensationalism is studying the Bible literally. Because when you
take the Bible literally, you wonÕt do what Sproul did. You understand what he
said? He said, ÔWeÕre not dispensationalists; we believe weÕre Israel!Ó You canÕt
take the Bible literally and believe that.
ÒThe true church today is the life of Christ
in us. When you look for your kin folk across the ages of church history, thatÕs
what youÕre gonna wind up looking for more than anything.Ó