To get a glimpse of just how lame George W. Bush is
as an Òevangelical Christian,Ó look at this excerpt from an ÒexitÓ
interview conducted last December by ABCÕs Nightline correspondent Cynthia
McFadden:
MCFADDEN: Is it literally true, the Bible?
BUSH: You know. Probably not ... No, I'm not a
literalist, but I think you can learn a lot from it, but I do think that the
New Testament, for example is ... has got ... You know, the important lesson is
"God sent a son."
MCFADDEN: So, you can read the Bible...
BUSH: That God in the flesh, that mankind can
understand there is a God who is full of grace and that thereÕs nothing you can
do to earn his love. His love is a gift and that in order to draw closer to God
and in order to express your appreciation for that love is why you change your
behavior.
*****
Telling people God came in the flesh so theyÕd be
prompted to change their behavior with the payoff of drawing closer to Him isnÕt
going to keep anybody out of hell. ThatÕs simply the performance-based
acceptance program religion pushes.
The most basic gospel message is that, in order to gain
eternal life through Jesus Christ, a person must rest their faith in what God
says He accomplished by bringing His Son down in human flesh and having Him die
on the Cross as the only payment for sin. This means believing not only in His
death at Calvary—and the finality of the victory against sin won there—but
in His resurrection.
Of course, the resurrection is
often a place where self-professed Christian ÒleadersÓ get tripped up. As IÕve
pointed out before, Jimmy Carter, in
his 1996 book Living Faith, tells the
reader that while he was raised from a baby in church, and was only three when
he began memorizing Bible verses in Sunday School, ÒBy the time I was 12 or 13
years old, my anxiety about (doubting ChristÕs resurrection) became so intense
that at the end of every prayer, until after I was an adult, before ÔAmenÕ I
added the words ÔAnd, God, please help me believe in the resurrection.Õ Ó
*****
As Jordan often repeats, ÒYouÕll never meet an honest
person who spent 15 hours looking at the actual evidence of the resurrection of
Jesus Christ not come to the conclusion: ÔHe came out of the grave.Õ
Jordan will then say, ÒNow, you might not like what the resurrection means, but you canÕt
look at the evidence with an unprejudiced heart and mind and not recognize the
historical reality that Jesus Christ rose from the dead.Ó
*****
From multiple passages in the Gospels, we know that after
Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples she had just seen Jesus Christ
resurrected from the dead, an emergency closed-door meeting was arranged for
that evening.
During the gathering, the resurrected Christ
miraculously appeared before them, saying, ÒPeace be unto you,Ó and showing them
His pierced hands and side.
The immediate response was the men Òwere terrified and
affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit,Ó according to Luke 24.
Jesus asked, ÒWhy are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?
Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a
spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.Ó
ChristÕs next question was, ÒHave ye here any meat?Ó, upon which they gave him Òa
piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb,Ó and He proceeded to eat in front
of them.
ÒWhat
you learn in John 20 is they were in a room theyÕd locked down and they thought
it was secure and, all of a sudden, Christ appears in their midst—literally
just came through the walls,Ó says Jordan. ÒThatÕs a passage that details the veracity and authenticity
of the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.
ÒThey see Him; they see He has a body that has flesh and
bones. ItÕs a real literal body thatÕs obviously also a supernatural body because
it just came into a locked-down room.
ÒBut when it literally materialized in front of them
they could touch Him and even see Him sit there in the fellowship of consuming
a meal with them. It was a real manifestation of someone they knew so they
wouldnÕt think He was a spirit, a ghost, or some kind of ethereal hallucination.
ÒThe fascinating thing is what the passage tells us
about the resurrection of the body because weÕre going to Ôhave a body made
like unto his body.Õ The capacity that His body has to function, you and I are
going to have!Ó
****
In I Corinthians 15, the Apostle Paul takes on the skeptics
of the resurrection with the admonishment: ÒAwake to righteousness, and sin
not; for some have not the knowledge of God: I speak this to your shame.
[35] But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what
body do they come?
[36] Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die:
[37] And that which thou sowest, thou sowest not that body that shall
be, but bare grain, it may chance of wheat, or of some other grain:
[38] But God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to every seed
his own body.Ó
Jordan explains, ÒThose questions came because people
were denying the resurrection. They were asking, ÔHow is it the dead are raised
and is it a real, physical, literal body, or is it just they live on in our
memories, or is there reincarnation?Õ
ÒYou remember in Acts 17 when Paul spoke of the
resurrection in Athens, the great intellectual center of the ancient world? ItÕs
still a center from which you and I are influenced today. ItÕs really the
intellectual center of western civilization.
ÒIn Acts 17:30, when Paul began to speak of the
resurrection, they said about him, ÔJust a babbler. Let him babble on,Õ and
Paul simply turned away from them.Ó
The passage reads, ÒAnd the times of this ignorance God
winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:
[31] Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the
world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given
assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.
[32] And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked:
and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter.
[33] So Paul departed from among them.Ó
*****
In trying to reason with the unbelieving Corinthians,
Paul writes, ÒNow if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say
some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?
[13] But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not
risen:
[14] And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your
faith is also vain.
[15] Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God; because we have
testified of God that he raised up Christ: whom he raised not up, if so be that
the dead rise not.
[16] For if the dead rise not, then is not Christ raised:
[17] And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your
sins.
[18] Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.
[19] If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most
miserable.Ó
Jordan explains, ÒIf you look at verse 14, Paul defines
what that means when he says Ôif you believed in vain.Õ What is vain faith? ItÕs to believe something that isnÕt true. If Christ
isnÕt raised from the dead, then your faith in His burial resurrection is dead.
Why? Because youÕre believing a lie! So what heÕs doing is demonstrating
how the resurrection isnÕt a lie; itÕs truth.Ó
*****
Jordan continues, ÒDid you ever hear about PascalÕs Wager?
Pascal was a French philosopher who became a Christian and his wager was, ÔIf
it turns out when I die that thereÕs no God, that the gospel isnÕt true, I
would have still lived the better life.Õ
ÒBut you see that isnÕt what those verses (in I
Corinthians 15) say. Now, it is true that if thereÕs no heaven, no hell, no God,
and Christ wasnÕt raised from the dead—if you live in obedience to the
truth of the Word of God you will live a better life; a higher life.
ÒIf you live in pursuit of, ÔBe ye kind one to another,
tenderhearted, forgiving one another,Õ youÕre going to make a better life; have
a better world about you. But youÕre also going to be vexed like Lot was who
lived in Sodom with the filthy conversation of the wicked.
ÒWhat
Paul says is, ÔHey, if this stuff isnÕt real, the book of Ecclesiastes . . . what
Solomon said—letÕs just Ôeat drink and be merry for tomorrow we die.Õ So
PascalÕs Wager isnÕt really well-founded. At least it isnÕt what
Paul thought—the resurrectionÕs that important.
ÒIn verse 36, notice how Paul answers: ÔThou fool, that
which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die.Õ HeÕs saying, ÔAre you
nuts?! You donÕt believe in the resurrection?! I mean, donÕt you realize that
every Spring you witness resurrection (in nature)?! You see it so often you donÕt
even think anything about it and youÕre questioning . . . Nah, youÕre nuts!Õ Ó