In an obvious attack on the Bible, OprahÕs
spiritual guide, Eckhart Tolle, argues in his mega-bestseller book A New Earth:
ÒThe Catholic and other churches are actually correct when
they identify relativism, the belief that there is no absolute truth to guide
human behavior, as one of the evils of our time; but you wonÕt find absolute
truth if you look for it where it cannot be found: in doctrines, ideologies,
sets of rules, stories. What do all these have in common? They are made up of
thought. Thought can at best point to the truth, but it never is truth. ThatÕs
why Buddhists say, ÔThe finger pointing to the moon is not the moon.Õ Ó
Of course, this has always been the pat
mantra of those who donÕt want to believe God had anything to do with the Bible.
They say, ÒItÕs just a bunch of stories written by men.Ó
Tolle stupidly reasons, ÒBeyond the realm of
simple and verifiable facts, the certainty that ÔI am right and you are wrongÕ
is a dangerous thing in personal relationships as well as in interactions between
nations, tribes, religions, and so on.Ó
Just how is society supposed to operate
without any definitive standards for moral behavior? Is it a simple, verifiable
fact that stealing is wrong or should all of us go on what we personally feel
is right regarding other peopleÕs property?
In todayÕs Chicago Tribune was a story about a truck driver whoÕs charged with
siphoning 100 gallons of diesel fuel from an underground tank at a Speedway gas
station in Chesterton, Ind.
He was said to have commented at the time of
his arrest that Òthe trucking industry had fallen on hard times because of gas
prices.Ó A spokesman for the local police department stated, ÒEven though this
may make him a hero in some peopleÕs eyes in trying to buck the system, it does
not excuse a crime.Ó
*****
Addressing ChristendomÕs envelopment by post-modernist
thinking (i.e., the rehashing of the ancient lie dating from the Garden of Eden
that Ôtruth is relativeÕ), Jordan confirms, ÒYou were not trained in your
education in the world to get whatÕs true out of facts and objective things. The
whole mindset is to look at facts and objective things subjectively: ÔHow do
they come across to me?Õ
ÒAnd itÕs in my inter-relationships--in my
experience with them—that I then decide how IÕm going to feel. ÔAm I
going to believe itÕs right or am I going to believe itÕs wrong? Am I going to
believe itÕs good for me or am I going to believe itÕs bad for me.Õ ThatÕs General Hospital, Days of Our Lives, The Young
and the Restless. Those shows are caricatures of the way the world thinks,
and that gets over into the church of Believers.
*****
The most destructive area where
post-modernism reigns in the lives of most Christians and theyÕre most often
not even aware of it is in the bible versions issue. The vast majority of
Christendom has no idea that the King James Bible is the only accurate English
translation and that all the other bible versions come from satanically
corrupted manuscripts or, in the case of the New King James Version, was
inaccurately rendered.
Jordan says, ÒFor the last 30 years IÕve
fought the battle about the bible versions and the battle was lost 20 years
ago. In fact, in just one of those funny ways that truth works, evangelicalism
out there thought they had put that issue to rest and then, in the early Õ90s,
along came this little lady from Ohio, Gail Riplinger.
ÒJust a little, petite, quiet, sickly little
lady with some real physical problems. She was a college professor and her
illness put her in the bed for 6-7 years where she couldnÕt work but she had
the college professor rights to the library and she did all this research.
ÒAnd because sheÕs a researcher in her
professional life, she understood how to do first-hand primary research and she
wrote that book, New Age Bible Versions,
and when that thing came out (in 1993) it blew the socks off all these
scholars.
ÒYou had guys like Norman Geisler, whoÕs
supposed to be this great Christian apologist, running around like a chicken
with his head cut off. And you got some dried-up prune out there in Arizona,
Jim White—he couldnÕt have gotten an audience on State Street with a bunch
of mission bums on his own, but when took up the cause and wrote a bunch of
stuff, and tried to be a champion about it, people tried to promote him and
gave him a ministry just to try to sink Ms. Riplinger.
ÒIt was fascinating to watch how that stuff
worked and see it all just blow up in their faces. They went around and said, ÔWell,
sheÕs just a Home Economics teacher.Õ Home Ec?! I mean, give me a break! If
they knew anything about what theyÕre talking about!
ÒItÕs that silly kind of stuff that grown
men, with more degrees than theyÕve have temperature, and with reputations as
being Christian celebrities, stoop to when they got no idea . . . They go around
and dumb, old, stupid Believers out there just think, ÔOooh, he said it, itÕs
got to be true!Õ TheyÕre worshipping their little god, their little hero, and
itÕs nonsense.
ÒIÕve watched these men and IÕve read the
books they write, and IÕve listened to Riplinger and them debate in person and
I know enough about the subject material to know if somebodyÕs telling the
truth or not or whether theyÕve got their facts in a row, and she just quietly
blows them out of the water. Some times they donÕt even know they got blown out
of the water itÕs so easy!
ÒYou look at all that and you say, ÔWow,
amazing!Õ and it just is! It just came at them out of nowhere. They thought
they had the battle won and then, ÔBoom!Õ here all this stuff comes out.
ÒTo this day, you still just mention her
name and people go absolutely bonkers. You go home tonight and watch John
Ankerberg on the TV and little JohnÕs credited by grace people as being a great
champion for the faith. Call him up on the phone and ask him about Gail Riplinger
and watch the steam come out of his ears.
ÒWatch him lose his grace and his white hair
turn red. And his sweet Christian manners turn into attack-dog tactics. And you
say, ÔWell, why is that?Õ Well, good men are always reasonable and when theyÕre
not, thereÕs something stickinÕ Õem and she stuck Õem out of the blue.
ÒYou know what the real problem with that
was and is? These guys said, ÔSheÕs not qualified to do what she did,Õ and she
said, ÔExcuse me?!Õ They say, ÔWell, you donÕt have degrees in the field.Õ
Excuse me?! Did you understand what a MasterÕs degree and a PhD degree is?
Those are what are called Ôresearch degrees.Õ You get a BachelorÕs degree, an
undergraduate degree, and now youÕre supposed to know how to think. Heh, heh.
ÒThe universities say, ÔNow that weÕve
taught you how to think we want you to go think about this,Õ and you get a MasterÕs
degree by doing two years of semi-original thinking on a topic. Research. And
then you do two more years and they give you the post-hole diggerÕs degree for original thinking into this area that
nobody has researched or written about.
ÒHave you ever read a doctrinal
dissertation? ThatÕs where a guy writes a paper to present a view, and in order
for it to pass muster—for you to get the degree—you have to
demonstrate in that doctrinal dissertation that youÕve read what everybody else
has said about this subject.
ÒSupposedly youÕve considered all the wisdom
out there on this subject and come to a conclusion about it. Well, you know
what happened to Ms. Riplinger? She actually did the original research that
these (other bible scholars) thought they did.
ÒYou see, if you go and read what Joes says
that Bob says, and what Bill says Bob says, and then what Mike says that Bob
says . . . If you read what they say Bob says thatÕs not first-hand. ThatÕs
what they say Bob says.
ÒBut if you just read what Bob says, thatÕs
first-hand. ThatÕs what Riplinger did. And you know what she found out? She
found out that Joe didnÕt always tell the truth about what Bob said.
ÒJoe would say what she thought Bob said.
Then Bill would say what he thought Bob said and tell you why he thought Joe
was wrong. And Mike would tell you what she thought Bill meant about what Bob
said and what Joe meant about what Bob said and nobody would read what Bob
said. Does that sound confusing? ItÕs supposed to. ThatÕs academia.
ÒAnd then you get this little lady that came
around and just read what Bob said—went out and told everybody what Bob
said—and you know what happens to these other guys? TheyÕre relegated to
irrelevance. But theyÕre the heroes. TheyÕre the celebrities. The Bible Answer
Man (who has a nationally-syndicated daily Christian radio program) builds
everything he does on what these guys say.
ÒWell, who cares what Bob said, or some
little lady telling you what Bob said who doesnÕt have anybody backing her and
sheÕs a woman to boot. You know, itÕs, ÔSurely God canÕt tell us anything through
a woman,Õ and she blows the socks off these people and sucker-punches them from
left field.
ÒThey werenÕt prepared for it and so they go
to reeling. And all that stuff has to do with the fact that when you donÕt have
objective truth to rest in, then all you have is things based on your
experiences.
ÒAnd if youÕre going to get truth out of
your experiences and go by, ÔIÕve got a relationship with these Christian
celebrities over here and I trust them because of their celebrityship,Õ then
your evaluation of what truth is is going to be based on who tells you what and
who you think they are, rather than what you read in a Book and do on your own.Ó