I had a friend tell me recently that her brother enjoyed reading my website but his wife told him not to go back to it because I donÕt believe in speaking in tongues.

 

I guess sheÕs not aware that in Scripture sign-seeking is a clear sign of unbelief.

 

ÒItÕs never the sign of faith,Ó says my pastor, Richard Jordan. ÒThe scripture says, for example, in I Cor. 14, ÔWherefore tongues are for a sign not to them that believe but to them that believe not.Õ

 

ÒThe requirement to have something outside of GodÕs Word confirm GodÕs Word is not a sign of confidence in GodÕs Word; itÕs a sign of a lack of confidence. Anything that moves you to your experiences over the Word . . . we donÕt believe what we believe because of our experiences, we believe it because itÕs GodÕs Word.Ó

 

*****

 

The fake practice of jabbering gibberish, insisting itÕs a supernatural gift from God, fits right in with the intentions of the developing Antichrist system. As Paul forewarns about the Antichrist in II Thess. 2:9, ÒEven him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders.Ó

 

Jordan explains, ÒFolks, the Antichrist, when he shows up, is going to work miracles (Rev. 16). HeÕs going to have signs of an apostle and heÕs going to profess to be an apostle. HeÕs going to profess to be GodÕs representative on earth and everyone will bow down and kiss his ring and call him ÔHoly FatherÕ and the rest of that business, and if somebody says, ÔWell, we donÕt believe you,Õ heÕll just go ÔpoofÕ and bring in the signs and prove it. HeÕll have the signs and wonders and Israel will say, ÔHere he is; this is our Messiah! WeÕve been looking for a sign!Õ Ó

 

In I Corinthians, each one of the nine sign gifts Paul lists, including tongues, were Jewish sign gifts that had nothing to do with the permanent ministry of the Body of Christ. They were simply used temporarily in the early Christian church to show the Jews God was at work in the Gentiles, initiating a new program.

 

ÒWhen Paul writes to the Romans to build them up in the faith and stablish them, he doesnÕt list the sign gifts because he knows theyÕre not going to last beyond this transition period,Ó says Jordan. ÒYou go over to Ephesians 4 where he lists the gifts there after the close of the Book of Acts and none of these things show up again.Ó

 

*****

 

Jordan continues, ÒWhy would the Holy Spirit will and desire that the sign gifts for Israel and IsraelÕs situation be in evidence among the Body of Christ, knowing especially the confusion it could cause for people today. Well, thatÕs not the reason he did it. That didnÕt deter Him because sound doctrine wouldnÕt cause confusion, and the confusion today is not the result of the ministry of the Holy Spirit, itÕs the result of ignoring the ministry of God the Holy Spirit thatÕs found in and through the teaching ministry of God.

 

ÒThere are two reasons I believe He put them there. No. 1, in I Corinthians 1:22, Paul says that the ÔJews require a sign.Õ They wonÕt believe without a sign and tongues, for instance, were a sign to Israel to validate the truthfulness of the message being preached to them. ItÕs a sign that the man thatÕs preaching to them is authentic and itÕs a true message from God.

 

ÒNo. 2, they were to show that the salvation of God had gone to the Gentiles, not through IsraelÕs rise but through their fall. Because, folks, when those Jews saw that Gentile out there speaking in tongues. . . remember that passage in Isaiah 28 that that was a sign of the judgment of God on Israel?

 

ÒNot only did it witness to the Jews next door, but it also benefited the Body of Christ because, as Paul says in I Corinthians 13, ÔFor we know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.Õ

 

ÒThe point of that passage is simply that thereÕs a transition period going on in the Book of Acts. By the time Paul got saved and began to get Ôthe revelation of the mystery,Õ there was a gradual increase in the revelation being given him. He didnÕt get the whole message in one revelation; he got it in a series Ôin abundance,Õ as he calls it.

 

ÒThatÕs why you see things he does in early Acts begin to fall away in the end—the speaking in tongues, the water baptism, the healing. As you go further into the Book of Acts, you see more and more of them shed away. More revelation begins to come on the scene and thereÕs more knowledge. Paul functions more clearly in the light of the new program.

 

ÒThe gifts were simply helps for the church in that transition period where they just had partial knowledge. As far as the church was concerned, it wasnÕt just a bunch of gibberish about non-consequential things; it ministered to them and gave them help and information and edification. And it was the means thereby where God amplified their knowledge during that transition period.

 

ÒThatÕs the reason Paul says (in I Cor. 14) that when you do them, do them properly and in order, because when you do it in order youÕll know itÕs God the Holy Spirit doing it through you and youÕll get the benefit from them.

 

ÒWhat you have to understand is there were things going on that these Believers didnÕt understand because youÕre in that last half of Acts (when Paul wrote I Corinthians) where thereÕs this transition from one program to the other and thereÕs a moving, or a setting aside of one, and a bringing in of the other, and the thing thatÕs being brought in hasnÕt been completely made known yet.

 

ÒWhen the man stood up and spoke in tongues it was a sign to the Jewish synagogue next door, but there was also an interpreter of that tongue which gave a doctrine and a revelation to the (Corinthian) assembly there. It wasnÕt just a bunch of people getting together wasting their time.Ó