The Bible says Òman in his
best state is altogether vanity,Ó and the book of Ecclesiastes is written specifically
for the intent of fully examining this issue.
Ecclesiastes, written by
Solomon, son of David, will, in fact, be used by the nation Israel in the Ôlast
daysÕ to educate the believing remnant about the satanic attack against them
and the things they shouldnÕt believe.
While Solomon wrote this book
as JerusalemÕs king, he identifies his work in the first line as being Òthe
words of the Preacher.Ó
As my pastor, Richard Jordan,
explains, ÒHeÕs going to proclaim a message for his people and thatÕs why heÕs
called the preacher. The word ÔecclesiastesÕ is the Latin form of the Greek
word for Ôpreacher,Õ and heÕs got a message for Israel.
ÒNow, we know from the last
few verses of the book he already came to his conclusion before he wrote the
book, but heÕs going to go back and talk about how he came to this
conclusion, which is, ÔVanity of vanities; all is vanity.Õ
ÒVanity, as someone once
defined it, is Ôemptiness that leads to disappointing misery,Õ and, boy, you
canÕt read the book of Ecclesiastes without seeing that as true in SolomonÕs
life.
ÒSolomon was a man who came
to the conclusions he came to through personal, thorough examination. He didnÕt
come to these things through just reading books. This book is the last word
on human philosophy because itÕs a book written by a guy who had thoroughly and
completely examined all of the positions of philosophical thinking, examined
them, evaluated them and dismissed them. Every major philosophy thatÕs been
developed from the time of Socrates, Aristotle and Plato finds its origins of
the book of Ecclesiastes.
ÒSolomon was in his day the
wisest man on the earth. You remember how he got that way? God says He gave him
that wisdom. And he was this God-made wise man. He was wise in every area of life,
not just spiritual things.
ÒHe was wise politically;
take the story about the two women with the baby—I mean youÕd have never
thought about doing it that way, would you? He was a wise man governmentally, he
was a great business leader. . . heÕll tell you about some of this in this
book.
ÒHe had one point in which he
wasnÕt so wise—he had 1,000 wives—but youÕd get a little experience
doing that. Obviously he had to be wealthy—in his day, or any day, if
youÕre going to have multiple families like that you have to have the ability
to provide for them.
ÒHe was a man of great
intellectual prowess: political prowess, human prowess, fleshly prowess, etc.,
and he wrote a book about all of it.
ÒIn verse 1:3, he writes,
ÔWhat profit hath a man of all his labour which he taketh under the sun?Õ ThatÕs
what heÕs looking for. Plato, Socrates, Aristotle—in the whole evaluation
process in life, the first question they had to come up with is, ÔWhat are we
looking for?Õ
ÒYou know what they decided
they were looking for? They were looking for good. ÔWhatÕs the good, whatÕs the
profit in life?Õ I wonder where they got that from? Well, you just read it in
verse 1:3. The wisest man who ever lived said when you evaluate life you need
to look for the profit. ÔWhatÕs the good thing in life, whatÕs the value in
life?Õ
ÒSolomon says, ÔI gave my
heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done
under heaven,Õ and when he did that, he had the ability to do it pedal to the
metal.
ÒIn verse 2:10, he says
Ôwhatsoever mine eyes desired I kept not from them, I withheld not my heart
from any joy.Õ Now thereÕs not a philosopher who ever lived on the face of
the earth who could say that! They all had restrictions.
ÒSocrates, for example,
was a homosexual. One of the great quotes they use of him is him going to a
party and he writes in his journal about having been able to see the underwear
of a young boy he was trying to seduce and how, to quote Socrates, ÔIt lit the
flame in me.Õ You read that and you think, ÔMaybe I donÕt want my kids reading
this kind of stuff.Õ Understand, heÕs the guy everybody thinks is the one who ought
to tell you what the good in life is!
ÒSolomon said, ÔI didnÕt have
any restraints; I didnÕt have anybody telling me I couldnÕt do something.Õ
Socrates had to go hide that stuff; put it behind the door. He couldnÕt do it
out in public because it wasnÕt exactly the public kind of thing. Solomon said,
ÔI had nothing that I wanted to do that I didnÕt do to the fullest. My heart
rejoiced in all my labor.Õ
ÒFrom Chapter 2:1 (ÔI said in
mine heart, Go to now, I will prove thee with mirth, therefore enjoy pleasure:
and, behold, this also is vanityÕ) we know Solomon would go out and just party.
ÒSolomonÕs saying, ÔYou
want to party; you never met a party animal like me! You think you partied. I
been there. I put the parties on! I did all that. But you know what I found out
at the end of the day? I still had that same emptiness down inside that I was
trying to get rid of. I said of laughter it is mad.Õ
Ò ÔI went out and said, ÔHey,
letÕs go to the comedy club. LetÕs see the funny side of life. LetÕs donÕt be
serious all of the time. LetÕs have some fun.Õ But he said when it was all over, ÔI still had that same
problem.Õ Ó
ÒVerse 2:3 says, ÔI sought in
mine heart to give myself unto wine, yet acquainting mine heart with wisdom;
and to lay hold on folly, till I might see what was that good for the sons of
men, which they should do under the heaven all the days of their life.Õ
ÒWhat heÕs saying there is, ÔI
went out and did these things but I was watching what was going on while I was
doing it.Õ HeÕs literally making notes on whatÕs happening. He said, ÔIÕm going
out here doing this stuff and IÕm looking at whatÕs really going on.Õ
ÒMost people who do those
things donÕt pay any attention to whatÕs going on. Solomon, though, says, ÔIÕve
evaluated it. And to lay hold of folly, Õtil I might see what was the good of the
sons of men, which they should do under the heavens all the days of their
life.Õ
ÒHe didnÕt find any good so
he said, ÔOkay, IÕll quit the folly, and the dissipation, and the tearing
myself down.Õ
ÒHe writes, ÔI made me great
works; I builded me houses; I planted me vineyards.Õ HeÕs saying, ÔHey, IÕll
get busy and go to work.Õ
ÒThe passage in Chapter 2
goes on, ÔI had great possessions of great and small cattle above all that were
in Jerusalem before me: I gathered me also silver and gold, and the peculiar
treasure of kings and of the provinces: I gat me men singers and women singers,
and the delights of the sons of men, as musical instruments, and that of all
sorts. So I was great, and increased more than all that were before me in
Jerusalem: also my wisdom remained with me.Ó
ÒHeÕs saying, ÔHey, J Lo
came and sang for me, and Brittany was trying to get on my docket, and Ernest Tubbs
wanted to come and play. P. Diddy even tried to show up. Whatever and whoever
they were, I got Õem. I had the Mormon Tabernacle Choir singing for me.Õ
ÒHe said, ÔI had them all. I
was at the point where they just wanted to come and be with me. I had money
running out my ears. The kings and the queens of the earth were coming to my
door and whatsoever my eyes desired, I got it all.Õ
ÒNow, look down at what he
says the result is. Starting in verse 15, he writes, ÔThen said I in my heart,
As it happeneth to the fool, so it happeneth even to me; and why was I then
more wise? Then I said in my heart, that this also is vanity. For there is no
remembrance of the wise more than of the fool for ever; seeing that which now
is in the days to come shall all be forgotten. And how dieth the wise man? as
the fool. Therefore I hated life; because the work that is wrought under the
sun is grievous unto me: for all is vanity and vexation of spirit.Õ
ÒHow does he die? As the
fool. You know what he saw when he looked at the vanity of human wisdom? He
wrote the proverb, ÔThe rich and the poor, rags and riches walk together.Õ You
know why they all walk together? ThereÕs a hole in the ground and they all wind
up there.
ÒAnd every time heÕd go
through one of these things, heÕd say, ÔYou know, thereÕs really not any
difference; if itÕs human labor, the workerÕs not really any better off than
the shirker because they all wind up in a hole in the ground.Õ Well, you name what it is? Is it fame? ItÕs brief, it
doesnÕt last, itÕs uncertain. YouÕre soon forgotten and then thereÕs a hole in
the ground and they die.Ó
In Chapter 2:24, in which
Solomon writes, ÒThere is nothing better for a man, than that he should eat and
drink, and that he should make his soul enjoy good in his labour,Ó he is
addressing the hedonists.
From verses like 2:25 (ÒFor
who can eat, or who else can hasten hereunto, more than I?Ó), it shows Solomon
sort of invented egotism, explains Jordan. Pragmatism is on display in the very
next verse: ÒFor God giveth to a man that is good in his sight wisdom, and
knowledge, and joy: but to the sinner he giveth travail, to gather and to heap
up, that he may give to him that is good before God. This also is vanity and
vexation of spirit.Ó
Verse 3:11 offers a classic
statement on agnosticism. 3:14 is a classic statement on theism. In 3:18 is
naturalism. Verse 3:19 is positivism. With 3:20, the first part is pantheism
and the last part is nihilism.
ÒHeÕs got them all named; all
registered right down through there,Ó says Jordan. ÒIn 5:2 thereÕs deism. 7:3
is stoicism. In chapter 7:16-17 thereÕs AristotleÕs Golden Mean. Aristotle is
one of the most famous people in Western civilization and he took those two
verses and developed what he called the Golden Mean; the good in life, the pleasure
in life. The Golden Mean says the way to have pleasure is to avoid the excesses
of the extremes and stay in the middle, and he got that idea from Solomon.
ÒYou want any of the
philosophies, SolomonÕs got them: stoicism, empiricism, egotism, pragmatism,
pantheism, nihilism, naturalism, positivism, theism, agnosticism, deism,
paganism, fascism, capitalism, socialism. . . ThatÕs just a list I made sitting in my office two weeks ago, just
reading through Ecclesiastes and writing the things down. The philosophies that
make up history come out of this book and IÕm saying all this to you because I
want you to see the conclusion. By the way, there are 10 vanities he lists in
the book and every one of them comes to the same conclusion.
ÒEach one of those
philosophies in Job, whether it was Eliphaz with his realism or Bildad with his
pragmatism or Zophar with his idealism, you find it in Ecclesiastes. In
Ecclesiastes 1 and 2 he uses realism, in 3-5 he uses pragmatism, and in 6-8 he
uses idealism, and he works through these things under the same categories back
in the Book of Job. Why do you think Solomon would have done that? He knew the
book of Job. He knew how to figure out and categorize what he needed to study
out there. He came to a conclusion.
ÒHe does it several times in
the book, but this is the one conclusion (in Ecc. 9:1) I wanted you to look at:
ÔFor all this I considered in my
heart even to declare all this, that the righteous, and the wise, and their
works, are in the hand of God: no man knoweth either love or hatred by all that
is before them.Õ
ÒYou know what the one thing
in the passage is that comes to all men no matter who they are; big shot or
little shot? Whatever you did, you couldnÕt put off death.
ÒSolomon writes in chapter
12:13-14, ÔLet us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep
his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every
work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it
be evil.Õ
ÒYou can save yourself
from wasting a lot of your life. . . Everything youÕre going to learn as you
study philosophy from the guy who already examined it, evaluated it and came to
a conclusion, is just that: ÔFear God and keep His commandments for this is the
whole duty of man. For God will bring every work into judgment with every
secret thing whether it be good or evil.Õ
ÒYou know what Solomon said?
ÔYou better not make that mistake of (the Gentiles) in Romans 1:21 where you
donÕt glorify God as God and neither are you thankful but you become vain in
your own imaginations and your foolish heartÕs darkened.
ÒSolomonÕs saying, ÔYou know
what? Been there, done that, it donÕt work. There are no answers to the
questions of life.Õ Now, sometimes you and I get so petty with our lives that
the only questions we see are the ones weÕve got to face tomorrow. The washing
machineÕs leaking. . .
ÒWe get caught up in those
little things, but when you back up a little and catch your breath, and you try
to look for, ÔHow do I get out from under all this stuff? IsnÕt there something
more?Õ there are no answers out there for that.
ÒYou know the only answer?
The only answer is, ÔThe wages of sin is death but the gift of God is eternal
life.Õ The only answer for death is from women coming to an empty tomb one
morning and an angel saying, ÔHeÕs not here for HeÕs risen.Õ There isnÕt any
other answer beyond that.
ÒI was watching on C-Span the
other day Brian Lamb in a replayed interview with Milton Friedman, the
economist who just died. He asked him, ÔWell, how you doing?Õ and FriedmanÕs
wife, Rose, spoke up and said, ÔWeÕre getting old.Õ And you know what, they put
him in a box this week. There it is.Ó
ÒSocrates was supposed to be
the originator of modern philosophy and he said the unexamined life is not
worth living. Well, thatÕs as good as far as it goes but then he didnÕt know
how to examine life. HeÕs the guy who came up with the brilliant statement,
ÔThe only thing I know for sure is that I donÕt know anything for sure.Õ Okay,
well youÕre the guy wanting to teach me. You take your car to the mechanic and
the only thing he knows for sure is that he doesnÕt know what the problem is.
ÒThereÕs not any real answer
for finding meaning and purpose in life outside of Jesus Christ. You know itÕs
Paul who tells you, ÔFor to me to live is Christ and to die is gain.Õ ThatÕs
the answer.
ÒItÕs not money, not
partying, not fame, not having a good time. ItÕs not having the accolades of
the world and all of the political, and financial, and religious and social
world at your feet. Solomon had all that and said itÕs just nothing.
Go to I Corinthians and
PaulÕs warning you, ÔFor the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For
it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.Õ In I Cor. 1:9 he
says, ÔFor it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring
to nothing the understanding of the prudent.Õ
ÒHowÕs he going to do that?
Paul says, ÔIt pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that
believe.Õ The world looks at you and says the idea that a dead Jew on a Cross
could make a difference is foolishness. That would be true if that dead Jew
hadnÕt been God.
ÒWhen He said, ÔIÕm the truth,Õ
HeÕs not saying two and two equals four and not three or five. Truth is more
than just being right; truth is the ultimate source of all reality. WhatÕs
really real in life? ThatÕs what Solomon was getting after: WhatÕs the good,
whatÕs the profit, what really makes life live? Jesus said, ÔIÕm the way for
you to go because IÕm the truth. IÕm the ultimate source of all reality.Õ
ÒYou know, Buddha would
have rolled over in his grave today if anybody thought he said that. Mohammed
wouldnÕt even have dared written something like that about himself. Confucius
would have scratched his head and thought you fell out of a tree on yours if
you said that about him. Jesus Christ said, ÔIÕm the source of all reality. The
real world wouldnÕt even exist without me. Now HeÕs either a mad man, or a bad
man, or HeÕs the God-man, but He canÕt be all of those.
ÒPeople say, ÔWell, HeÕs a
good religious teacher.Õ No, no, HeÕs either a mad man or a bad man; HeÕs not a
good religious teacher. He either is who He said He was or HeÕs out of His
gourd. ÔIÕm the truth.Õ How do you know? ÔBecause IÕm the life.Õ You see,
everything about the gospel; everything about Christ dying for your sins;
everything about Him giving you His life through His resurrection, is based
upon the historically demonstratable fact of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
ÒI sat with a young lady
recently who just graduated from a university in her home state and while she
was there, she said she lost her faith. She said, ÔI donÕt understand how you
can say the BibleÕs right and everybody else is wrong. I just donÕt see it. TheyÕve
got all these arguments.Õ
ÒWhat IÕve been trying to say
to you, theyÕve got arguments, they just arenÕt good ones. TheyÕre wrong. And I
said to this young woman, ÔCan I tell you about the time I thought about that
same thing.Õ I said, ÔYou know, the one thing you havenÕt examined, that if
you will examine it, it will make a difference in your life? And thatÕs the
historical evidence for the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ, because our
faith doesnÕt rest on the coffin lid of our founder.Õ
ÒJesus Christ is not the
pathetic echo from the bygone past whoÕs with us in our thinking and in our
spirit. HeÕs an ever-living, everlasting Saviour and that empty tomb proves it
and, folks, if He can come out of that tomb. . .just the fact that He did, you
can prove it in a court of law better than I can prove youÕre sitting here this
morning. If He did, then when He said, ÔIÕm the truth,Õ you can believe it. And
when He said, ÔThy Word is truth,Õ you can believe that because He knows
something about it, and so you can trust Him to be Ôthe way.Õ Ó