In an edition of PBSÕ Religion
& Ethics Newsweekly program that aired
last September, a video clip of Rick Warren at a speech in Pittsburgh showed
him telling the crowd, ÒNow, let me just be honest with you, folks. ThereÕs
nothing new in the book The Purpose-Driven Life that hasnÕt been said in historic Christianity in the
last 2,000 years. I just put it in one book and said it in a real simple way.Ó
In his book, Warren not only
passes off as new-and-improved all kinds of false religious notions from ancient
times, he does the same with pure pagan nonsense.
For one example, he talks
about discovering your ÒS.H.A.P.E.Ó (listed as Spiritual Gifts, Heart,
Abilities, Personality and Experience) to Òunlock your God-given potential.Ó
*****
As Jordan explains, ÒWarren
goes through the idea of the four temperaments (sanguine, choleric, melancholy
and phlegmatic), but do you know where he got that stuff from? The four
personality types originated with Hippocrates, the father of modern medicine. In
the 2nd century, Galum of Pergamus took it and popularized it and
made it a big thing. Hippocrates said it came about from the phases of the sun.
ItÕs all really just pagan astrology.
ÒAll that kind of
information was very popular in PaulÕs day, but Paul never said go out and find
your personality type! He didnÕt say take a spiritual-gifts test!
ÒDrama and morality plays
were a very prominent thing in the Greek Hellenistic culture Paul lived in, but
he didnÕt say go use drama. He didnÕt say to use discussion groups and sensitivity-training
programs. He said Ôspeak thou the things which become sound doctrine.Õ
Warren is such a far-gone
false teacher he actually recommends in his Purpose-Driven book the book, Secret Pathways, by renowned New-Ager Gary Thomas. Echoing Thomas,
Warren says there are nine ways Òsensates love God with their senses and
appreciate beautiful worship services that involve their sight, taste, smell
and touch, not just their ears.Ó He talks about how some Òworship him in
nature,Ó while Òtraditionalists draw closer to God through rituals, liturgies,
symbols and unchanging structures.Ó
Jordan says, ÒAll this stuff
that goes on in Christendom today—experienced-based things that people
seek after and love and want that donÕt produce maturity—really only produce
emotional reactionism and external activities that result in external religion
rather than the growth of the inner man.
ÒReligion focuses on getting
a big fat outer man, when what you need is a big fat inner man, and then he just
begins to bust out all over. Get that picture in your mind!
ÒYou need your inner man to
be a big, robust, healthy person, and when itÕs Ôthe life which I now live in
the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself
for me,Õ (Gal. 2:20) then that life lives out through you. Then thereÕs an inner compulsion, rather than
that form (of godliness), youÕre trying to push down the road.Ó
*****
A great article I found recently
on the internet, written by David Cloud of Fundamental Baptist Information
Center, Port Huron, Mich., asks the question, ÒWhy is C.S. Lewis so popular
with evangelicals today?Ó
Cloud gives a three-part answer, beginning
with, ÒFIRST, NEW EVANGELICALS LOVE C.S. LEWIS BECAUSE THEY ARE
CHARACTERIZED BY A PRIDE OF INTELLECT AND LEWIS WAS DEFINITELY AN INTELLECTUAL. He had almost a photographic memory and had a triple
first at Oxford in Philosophy, Classics, and English. He was one of the
greatest experts of that day in English literature and occupied the first Chair
in Medieval and Renaissance Literature at Cambridge University. Since New
Evangelicals almost worship intellectualism (a spirit that the late David Otis
Fuller called ÔscholarolatryÕ), it is no surprise that they would look upon the
famous intellectual C.S. Lewis as a patron saint.Ó
The second reason Cloud gives is, ÒNEW
EVANGELICALS LOVE C.S. LEWIS BECAUSE OF HIS ECUMENICAL THINKING AND HIS REFUSAL
TO PRACTICE SEPARATION.Ó
In an overview of LewisÕ ecumenical
philosophy and despising of biblical separation, Cloud writes, ÒIn his preface
to Mere Christianity, Lewis states
that his aim is to present Ôan agreed, or common, or central or mere
Christianity.Õ So he aims to concentrate on the doctrines that he believes
are common to all forms of Christianity--including Roman Catholicism. It is no surprise that he submitted parts of the book
to four clergymen for criticism--an Anglican, a Methodist, a Presbyterian, and
a Roman Catholic! He hopes that the book will make it clear why all Christians
Ôought to be reunitedÕ. . .
ÒIn March 1994 the
Evangelicals and Catholics Together movement produced its first document. This
was a programatic document entitled Evangelicals and Catholics Together: The
Christian Mission in the Third Millennium. It was rightly said at the time that this document represented Ôa
betrayal of the Reformation.Õ I saw no connection between this and C.S. Lewis
until a couple of years later when the symposium Evangelicals and Catholics
Together: Working Towards a Common Mission was published. In his contribution to the book, Charles Colson--the
Evangelical Ôprime moverÕ behind ECT--tells us that C.S. Lewis was a major
influence which led him to form the movement (Billy Graham was another!). In
fact, Colson says that Evangelicals and Catholics Together seeks to continue
the legacy of C.S. Lewis by focusing on the core beliefs of all true Christians (Common Mission, p. 36).Ó
The third reason Cloud gives is, ÒNEW
EVANGELICALS LOVE C.S. LEWIS BECAUSE OF THEIR SHARED FASCINATION FOR OR AND
SYMPATHY WITH ROME. TodayÕs evangelicals
have given us ÔEvangelicals and Rome TogetherÕ and even those who do not go
that far usually speak of RomeÕs errors in soft, congenial terms rather than
labeling it the blasphemous, Antichrist institution that it is and that
Protestants and Baptists of old plainly called it. As we have seen, C.S. Lewis considered the Roman
Catholic Church one of the acceptable ÔroomsÕ in the house of Christianity and
longed for unity between Protestantism and Romanism. Lewis believed in
prayers to the dead and purgatory.
ÒSome of LewisÕs closest friends were Roman
Catholics. J.R. Tolkien of Lord of the Rings fame is one example. Tolkien and Lewis were very
close and spent countless hours together. Lewis credited Tolkien with having
a large role in his Ôconversion.Õ Lewis was also heavily influenced by the
Roman Catholic writer G.K. Chesterton.
When asked what Christian writers had helped him, Lewis remarked in 1963, six
months before he died, ÔThe contemporary book that has helped me the most is
ChestertonÕs The Everlasting Man.Õ
ÒLewis carried on a warm correspondence in
Latin with Catholic priest Don Giovanni Calabria of Italy over their shared Ôconcern
for the reunification of the Christian churchesÕ (The Narnian, Alan Jacobs, pp. 249, 250). Calabria was beatified by
Pope John Paul II in 1988.
ÒIn 1943, Lewis gave a talk on ÔChristian
ApologeticsÕ for a group of priests in Wales (The Narnian, p. 229). From the 1940s to the end of his life,
LewisÕs spiritual advisor was a Catholic priest named Walter Adams (The
Narnian, p. 224). It was to this
priest that Lewis confessed his sins.
ÒRoman Catholics love C.S. Lewis as much as
evangelicals. His books are typically found in Catholic bookstores.Ó
(EditorÕs Note: To read about how the
emerging ecumenical church movement, as well as the future religion of the
Antichrist, is being hammered together through Roman Catholicism, click on
ÒBack IssuesÓ at the top and scroll down to these three articles: ÒSt. PeterÕs
Touch Foot-Baal Wear,Ó Oct. 22, 2006; ÒBaal Bounces Back,Ó Sept. 10, 200; and ÒUltimate Truth! New and Improved,Ó
Aug. 14, 2006)